This is one of the best activities I have ever facilitated and the feedback from delegates was excellent. I used it as part of a team building event and although it is quite a challenging task, the delegates were enthusiastic, excited and engaged the whole time.
One delegate had recently paid to attend an Escape Room experience and she said that this beat it, hands down!
My advice would be to thoroughly read all the Trainer Notes and briefs beforehand and ensure that all the handouts are set up in advance so that it runs smoothly.
I will definately be running this activity again!
|
Mike Darbyshire
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a great activity which I used at a team building event with a large group. The groups found the activity exciting and were well engaged throughout, and the extensive notes helped me deliver a comprehensive analysis/discussion at the end which was relevant to their own roles and had some key take away themes and messages. It took them about an hour to work out each of the codes, and then another 15 mins or so to work out the order of the codes. The activity allowed me to demonstrate the importance of working well in their own teams as well as between teams, and showed how attention detail was important. This had direct parallels with their current roles in their teams, and demonstrated how shortcomings in one team would lead to the overall task not being completed (and this is the case in their current work too). The feedback from the group on the task was entirely positive. We are primarily a work from home company so to see people in the office, some meeting each other for the first time, was fantastic. I ran this all in one large room, rather than separate groups and was more relaxed on how many times groups could meet to discuss. This led to, at times, colleagues running round in chaos trying to work out the answer and getting tied in knots - this is exactly what I wanted as it showed the teams how focusing on one thing can lead to chaos and ineffective problem solving. I would highly recommend this activity to improve teamwork and communication in the team, and will certainly be using it again!
|
Tom Eustice
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is an addition to my previous review.
I ran this exercise today but at the last minute had some dropouts so my numbers dropped to 7. I immediately thought "how can I make 4 teams with 7 people?" and panicked a little! However, I decided to split the group into two teams and give each team two daughters' packs of letters. As it was pretty last minute, the letters were still grouped together as they would be for four teams. If I were to do this again I would arrange the letters in date order to make it less obvious as they spotted the wrongly delivered letters quite quickly. I would also change the brief slightly - I told each team they represented two daughters which perhaps directed them to the two lots of letters. If I have to run it with two groups again I would just say "you need to work out the codes for the safe and how they should be entered".
It still worked - I thought this group would solve it quicker as they had more information available, but it simply presented a different challenge of having to remember which information went with which address to identify the daughters.
Overall a fantastic and very flexible activity!!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I ran this activity as part of a session with 14 senior leaders designed to move our company culture from one of blame and silo working to one with a more collaborative working style. I was slightly apprehensive about how it would be received but they all dived in head first (maybe too quickly for some of the teams!).
It was interesting to observe how the different personality types dealt with the challenges of communication and the "rules" set out at the start. This was something that came out in the debrief and highlighted the value of a mixture of personalities in a team.
It took longer than the suggested 90 minutes to crack the codes, but they had only had one attempt and then were so close I gave them extra time and rescheduled some of my other activities. It was the first time I had run the exercise so I think next time I might set a time limit for the first attempt.
I noticed that the "wrong" letters were direct swaps between two teams in each case. This meant that all 4 teams didn't need to cooperate in the first meeting. Next time I run it I'm going to move the wrong letters so they all need to get together to get the right information.
I also had the issue of the correct codes being remembered by my laptop (mentioned in a previous review). Luckily I had my Head of Digital in the session so he helped me figure out how to stop this. I use Google Chrome and had to disable the autofill addresses function.
The activity got great feedback from the group and they said they would have liked to have had more time to do the debrief so I will build that in next time.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise in a physical setting with a team of solicitors and it worked exceptionally well.
As expected, I was met with some cynisism from a couple of team members but the majority liked the chance to step away from the day job.
By the end of the exercise everyone was completely immersed in the activity and cracking the code.
The facilitation and learning review for transference back to the workplace is essential so make sure you leave adequate time for this part, otherwise it could end up as a fun exercise without the 'so what?'
|
Darren Smith
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
The session was delivered as a part of a team offsite/retreat. The theme of their offsite was collaboration which included approximately 65 lawyers (Juniors to Partners) from 3 different offices across NZ. With advice from the Glasstap team we split the team into 3 different groups and then within the 3 groups – they were split into 4 teams of 4-5 people. Despite the size of the group the activity went really well. In the time we had available one of the teams managed to crack the code with a little guidance from myself. The other 2 teams were very close. Due to the room locations and space we were a bit ‘fast and loose’ on the rules around phone calls and meeting times, however the teams still has to overcome the complexity of the task and identify the need to collaborate. The group were still talking about it later on that night and few days later one of the senior solicitors (who has completed many similar team building exercises over the years) gave feedback to say it was very relevant to the workplace and applicable for lawyers. It’s definitely an activity to run again with another group. Lots of laughter and learning.
|
Michelle Maidens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a fantastically designed activity. Very clever with so many learning opportunities. We were spread out in a large 5 story building and I had a facilitator for each team which helped enormously. The main area to watch out for is how to keep track of how many face to face meetings have taken place. I was moving around the teams, observing throughout and found it hard to know who had met with who - then I had to go round the teams to update them on how many meetings had happened. For example, team 1 and 2 met first, whilst I was on my way round to tell teams 3 and 4, 3 and 4 decided to meet! The de-brief was very powerful and some great points about information sharing, knowledge, power and competition, the efficiency of all meeting face to face came out. It's very painful (!) and fascinating to watch the teams go through the process so differently to each other. The other small thing to watch out for is the 'history' of the previously typed codes could show up when the teams type theirs in - so you just need to ensure you've got rid of all information history.
Thank you to whoever designed this game. I'm definitely going to use it again.
|
Lorna Logan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
What can I say!? This activity was a massive success. I was slightly worried as I ran it for a group quite a bit larger than it suggests in the brief. I had 8 people in each team and there were 4 teams. In my situation it worked really well and helped us think about how to structure communication between teams as undoubtedly the large number of people placed a strain on what was discussed and how the conversations took place during the sections in which teams were brought back together. Trainers' Library offer a website that your participants can enter attempts of the safe code into. I had originally intended to use this approach and even purchased a pay as you go broadband stick to assist with this – however, when I got to the venue it was a broadband black spot and I couldn’t connect. In the end this worked in my favour as participants had to write their attempts on a flip chart and it meant they could refer to their previous guesses collectively to help them along. This is a well thought through activity. It does require a bit of extra kit, but it’s worth the investment.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I use the exercise with a leadership team to discuss the impact of virtual teams. Each team represented a geography. I shorten the times given in the exercise to increase the pressure on the teams. Great fun and learning, resulting in key takeways for every leader, based on goals, process and indivdual behaviours. Highly recommeded and five stars.
|
Sat Duhra
|
|
I ran this activity as part of a Team Bonding programme with 14 corporate bankers of mixed cultural background. Overall it was a success: energetic, thanks to the need to go to meeting points, usefully frustrating and revealing. Main learning points: information sharing, attention to detail, communication, listening to each other, time management. Duration including debriefing: 2.5 hours with a mix of native and non-native speakers of English. This particular team was very quick to spot the wrongly delivered letters in their sets – and one of the CEOs immediately blamed me for having made a mistake, which provided a great learning moment! The greatest challenge was structuring the information sharing. This group tried to find out their names mainly by phone calls: “Are you Alice?” which didn’t help much, and they did not use a flipchart for some structured elimination until their 3rd meeting. Also they did not divide tasks within the teams: everybody went for the codes. When I mentioned this later on, they replied that the brief just said: find the codes. Another learning point. I did need to help them correct the birth order of the daughters. The entire group got stuck on the paragraph that says Alice is the youngest if only by 4 minutes. Because Esther is mentioned in the next sentence as “so small when she was born”, everyone logically deduces that she and Alice are the twins. I must admit that I agree with the deduction, and I find this paragraph slightly contrived as a red herring. Without help I don’t think they would have solved the problem. Warnings for the trainer: This activity is challenging for everyone. Take time to familiarise yourself with the material. I created 4 flipchart sheets for the debriefing, on which I indicated, per team, the various vital clues. Also think carefully about logistics. With 4 different locations it is physically impossible for 1 trainer to monitor all teams, but you do need this for a valuable debriefing. I took an assistant. Also if the teams are unclear on when they will meet up, it can quickly turn chaotic and although that is in itself useful, you still want to at least appear to be in control as a trainer. The brief does not say whether all teams should attend the 5-min meetings. I decided to impose this, with at least 1 delegate from each team. Also I specified that a meeting could not begin until at least 1 delegate per team was present. TIP: As a prop / souvenir I created the Elixir of Excellent Leadership using small bottles of flood flavouring in alluring colours (raspberry, banana, lemon). I soaked off the label and replaced it with one showing the name of the elixir, date and occasion, participant’s name, our logo and the client’s logo. I placed them in a wooden box and opened this at the end of the debriefing.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I ran the session last week with a group of very technical and clever Offshore Engineering guys working in the oil and gas industry. It was the final exercise after 3 days of training in a variety of interpersonal skills such as time management, communication, influencing, conflict management and assertiveness. We also did the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and this exercise enabled people to work brilliantly to type! The majority of people are quite detail conscious but also introverted. This meant that they spent the first 45 minutes in their groups trying to work out the codes. It took another 15 minutes for them to have their first meeting. (I deliberately left them as I needed them to demonstrate the point that whilst some thinking is good you also need to do some action at some point!) They struggled with the inter group communication due to a few technical issues with the hotel phones but they still weren’t properly prepared or structured for the meeting which turned into a bit of a free for all with lots of conversations on the side and some misleading information given by people who didn’t have all the facts. One group lost the plot completely and said they weren’t going to share – great for some conflict management practice!! They also realised that having meetings earlier would have made a huge difference – a good learning point for their working environment. So overall it worked very well – they didn’t achieve the task as people made assumptions or gave random responses which threw the other team members – but this really helped in discussing what happens back in the workplace. Thank you so much for another cracking activity – the amount of information is staggering and you’ve done a fantastic job – there’s no way I could have put this together without hours and hours of work so thank you!
|
Ann Pemberton
|
|