|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about what causes meetings to be ineffective. • To identify what can be done to make meetings effective. • To introduce the acronym APPLE and explain how focusing on five simple themes will help participants ensure meetings are effective.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about what causes meetings to be ineffective. • To identify what can be done to make meetings effective. • To introduce the acronym APPLE and explain how focusing on five simple themes will help participants ensure meetings are effective.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this alongside "Pet's Meeting" as part of a short lunchtime session on effective meetings. It worked brilliantly. People loved the mnemonic and it was mentioned in several feedback forms. I followed the notes but also added extra exercises and slides for each of the letters (for Aim we wrote a purpose statement for an upcoming meeting, for Preparation we put together a 5 column agenda for the Pet's Meeting etc.)
|
Jane Butler
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this module along with 'The ineffective Meetings' video and 'Meeting Costs - calculating the real cost of a meeting' as part of an in house Leadership Development Programme for a mixed group of 10 junior/middle managers and the response was fantastic. They found the simple acronym 'APPLE' easy to understand and implement into their daily working environment. What was particularly useful was that they all became very aware of how ineffective and costly the meetings they were holding had become and the introduction of 'APPLE' could not have come at a better time for them. An excellent combination, thank you Glasstap.
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • This exercise is designed for the start of a team session that reviews the previous year; in particular what went well, what people struggled with and what they learnt from it.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • This exercise is designed for the start of a team session that reviews the previous year; in particular what went well, what people struggled with and what they learnt from it.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A balloon for each participant. (It’s preferable to have lots of different colours.) • A whistle or claxon to tell everyone to stop. • You will need a nice (indoor) space for participants to throw their balloons in the air and keep all the balloons airborne.
Notes: You will need to plan a little in advance for this activity and be prepared to send out reminder emails to ensure the pre-exercise task is completed. Larger groups will necessitate a longer running time for the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To identify specific actions that will enable groups to achieve a shared vision. • To help individuals see how they will contribute to the achievement of a shared vision.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To identify specific actions that will enable groups to achieve a shared vision. • To help individuals see how they will contribute to the achievement of a shared vision.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Staff at all levels working in a team. It is particularly well suited to new teams formed for a fixed period to manage/implement a project.
You'll Need: • Plenty of sheets of thin A4 card. • A selection of coloured pens (felt tip pens are ideal).
Notes: This module allows the group to share their ideas on how they intend to work together to achieve a shared vision. The group need to be clear about what their vision is. If this isn’t the case, then you might wish to use the module, Creating a Shared Vision beforehand to achieve this. If you are using the organisation, or team’s vision statement, you will need to pre-prepare a visual aid (PowerPoint or Flipchart) to display at the start of the exercise.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great activity to enable teams to collaborate and work together in building a shared vision/strategy for the team.
|
Donna Rodgers
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
This is a good activity to run in conjunction with ‘creating a shared vision’ and is the logical next step. It was good for helping individuals identify the specific steps that are needed to create a shared vision. It was a good activity for placing some onus on each group member to realise how it is the individual parts that make up the whole. There is a little bit of preparation needed for this one, so make sure that you are able to access the additional resources outlined on the Trainers' Library website before you think about running this one.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To think about what needs to happen to ensure we don't regret the things we didn't do. • To consider the feelings of success, and their impact upon motivation. • To look at the importance of creating objectives that are SMART. • To consider the importance of taking control, and what prevents us doing that. • To provide an opportunity for participants to think about their own short, medium and long-term goals.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To think about what needs to happen to ensure we don't regret the things we didn't do. • To consider the feelings of success, and their impact upon motivation. • To look at the importance of creating objectives that are SMART. • To consider the importance of taking control, and what prevents us doing that. • To provide an opportunity for participants to think about their own short, medium and long-term goals.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: You might want to follow this module with the module entitled Five Balls – Goal Setting and Motivation, which illustrates the value of breaking long-term goals down into short-term achievable chunks. We also recommend you refer to the module Breaking Goals Down, which contains further ideas for building on this module.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to be able to define coaching and its purpose. • To explain the key differences between coaching and mentoring. • To enable participants to describe a basic coaching model. • To identify the core skills required by effective coaches.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to be able to define coaching and its purpose. • To explain the key differences between coaching and mentoring. • To enable participants to describe a basic coaching model. • To identify the core skills required by effective coaches.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 24 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Plenty of space for participants to work in pairs for this module.
Notes: Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This is a great introduction to coaching which I used for a group of 6 managers from different parts of the business recently. It opened their eyes to the differences between coaching and mentoring in particular. Whilst practicing during the two days we spent together, the GROW model helped the managers to get in to the right flow. Thanks team - yet another great tool!
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This module was a great introduction to coaching and the group of managers whom I was working with found it extremely valuable. The exercises challenged them all however they found them useful and interesting and extremely valuable to be able to practice new techniques in a controlled and safe environment. The GROW model is simple and effective and the managers all felt this is a model they could take back to the office and use effectively with their team members; after a little practice! Thank you Glasstap.
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider what constitutes unacceptable behaviour in the workplace. • To encourage participants to think about the impact of their own behaviour on others.
About
Time:
The exercise in this module can be completed within 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete the module.
Aims:
• To consider what constitutes unacceptable behaviour in the workplace.
• To encourage participants to think about the impact of their own behaviour on others.
Group Size:
This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For:
Staff at all levels, but especially supervisors and managers.
You'll Need:
Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes:
This module makes the point that is the impact of behaviour that
matters, not the intent. It includes a thought provoking exercise that will
promote discussion of the key learning points.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise is great for starting a discussion about behaviours in the workplace. In an organisation with staff in office, factory and warehouse settings it was interesting to discuss the differences and should the behaviour be more acceptable in one place than another. The importance of context also came out strongly. I loved that the way the exercise is run means the "right" and "wrong" comes from the group, so the trainer doesn't need to be preachy about the topic, and can challenge views by throwing them out to the rest of the group.
I would use this exercise with any group where raising awareness of potentially harmful behaviours would be useful.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Brilliant exercise for getting delegates into deeper discussions about behaviours and their impact. I also customised some statements to make them relevant to the groups I was working with (using the word template). This made the exercise even more powerful. The client wanted to highlight the differences between Firm Management and Bullying so I used this exercise in conjunction with the article by Sheila Williams.
|
Rosemary Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have run 90 minute Banter and Bullying sessions for 250 people now in 4 organisations. It really helped to have this module as the main focus of the session. It certainly raised awareness of how one persons banter can be another person feeling bad! It works at th simple level of showing how difficult it is to define where the line is, but also helped to make people more likely to intervene if they witnessed problems. It also worked with teams who had many members were English was a second language. Not much extra explanation was needed. Powerfully thought provoking, and really rammed home the "it depends" thinking.
|
Phil Hawthorn
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This activity was used for middle managers who had little or no experience of recruiting staff. This content was used in conjunction with “Take your pick – short listing candidates” The course content was good and easy to use; participants had to think and discuss about colleagues roles. This was used as the first activity of the day which meant everyone could make an input. It showed a link between skills, attitudes and behaviours, how they all inter link and how they are all equally important. The activity was a good discussion basis and I was able to build more into the session from the group discussion afterwards.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I was asked by our board of directors to run a session throughout the company that would highlight how to identify and deal with bullying and harassment. Although we don’t have a problem with this the directors wanted all employees to have the knowledge of how to deal with it if it does happen. I have run this session approximately 25 times now with groups of 4 -10. This mini session was really good and highlighted things that people do and say in everyday life that they don’t realise can often offend people and make them feel “bad” about themselves. Everyone enjoyed this session and the feedback was all positive.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face as a manager and how to approach them with the right balance of ethics and pragmatism.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore some of the challenges participants will face as a manager and how to approach them with the right balance of ethics and pragmatism.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 4 to 18 participants.
Useful For: Learners who are brand new managers (or very soon will be), particularly if they have been promoted from within the team.
You'll Need: • Playing pieces, one per team. • Small prize for the winning team. • 60 second timer or stopwatch. • Facilitator Traffic Lights. • At a Crossroads Conundrum Cards. • At a Crossroads Diversion Cards (3 per team). • At a Crossroads Game Board. • At a Crossroads Suggested Answers (for the facilitator).
Notes: This exercise is suitable for use with groups of up to 18 participants. It is run as a competitive game, which is a race to the finish and played in teams of two or three players. We do not recommend having teams with more than three participants. All the scenarios contained in the cards are based on actual experiences faced by managers in their first year of managing a team. It is a particularly useful exercise for people who have been promoted from within the team to become the manager and who are struggling to adapt to their new role with people who were once their peers.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I recently used this during a two day introduction to management course. The participants loved and it was a great resource to use that was fun but achieved important, relevant learning outcomes. This will be a resource that I will continue to use with the added advantage that the gameboard can be used with the performance management cards, when I run the next course for managers on coaching and mentoring.
|
Sue Bartlett
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
On Tuesday this week I used the At a Crossroads activity from Trainers Library with a group of 4 newly appointed managers.
What a great activity. We had full interaction and the conundrum cards really threw up some challenges that the participants could relate to. It was great to be in control of the traffic lights so that we could really discuss each challenge and hear the different perspectives on how each individual would potentially deal with that challenge.
We didn't get through all the cards, however the participants have asked for round 2 at our next workshop because they enjoyed the activity so much.
I am aware that you can download the road map and cards however I made the small investment and bought the resources from Trainers Library as I know this will be used time and time again.
Great resource, easy & fun to use and definitely encouraged much debate and thinking.
If you've not used it then try it.
|
Pauline Weddell
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This exercise provides a lot of different scenarios for managers to consider how they would respond.
I have used a slightly adapted version of this exercise as a warm up for management development training. I have a series of workshops focussing on different aspects of management behaviours, with the same group of participants each time, and used this as a warm up exercise for workshop 2. Instead of using the board, I asked the teams to pick a card from the deck and read it out. Team A picks and reads then Teams B and C have 30 seconds to come up with a response. Team A picks their favourite response and awards that team a point. Then move on to Team B. I repeat this to cover 9 randomly picked cards. Each card read gives an opportunity for discussion around the best way to handle the situation.
As there are so many cards, I will probably repeat this as the warm up for workshops 3 and 4 too.
Another great resource from Trainers' Library!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To identify what gets in the way of internal customer service. • To consider ways to reduce or eliminate the barriers to internal customer care.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 55 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify what gets in the way of internal customer service. • To consider ways to reduce or eliminate the barriers to internal customer care.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Post its, pens and flip chart paper. • The Activity Link and your PIN.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the link between attitudes and beliefs, and results. • To identify the need to take responsibility for our own results. • To build an understanding of what individuals might be capable of, if they adopt a positive attitude, and push themselves a little more.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider the link between attitudes and beliefs, and results. • To identify the need to take responsibility for our own results. • To build an understanding of what individuals might be capable of, if they adopt a positive attitude, and push themselves a little more.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise includes mention of the story of Malala Yousafzai. Depending upon your audience, you may wish to substitute it for another story that resonates with your participants. If you do use a different story, it is important that you choose ones that will be well known to your participants and which will highlight an individual who has overcome significant hardship to achieve something of genuine importance.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand what their leadership (and followership) style is through physicalising part of the leadership process.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50-60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75-90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand what their leadership (and followership) style is through physicalising part of the leadership process.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of any size, however the exercise works much better with larger groups.
Useful For: Managers, directors and others in leadership roles.
You'll Need: • Blindfolds. • A large, empty space (see notes).
Notes: This exercise can provide participants with a very different insight into their leadership style (and their style as a follower). It is particularly useful for exploring trust and being hands on and hands off. You need a large, empty space for this exercise. Any chairs should be placed against the walls of the room, leaving as much space as possible. It is possible to do this exercise outside, for example on a lawn. There is the risk of people knocking into each other, a wall or furniture in this exercise. Make clear that participants guiding another colleague are responsible for that participant’s safety at all times. * Although you can run this exercise with less than 8 participants it works much better with larger groups.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short term objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 35 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short-term objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: We have provided you with a suggested Gap Analysis about learning to juggle. If your participants all work in a similar role or for the same organisation, you might wish to substitute this example with one that is more relevant to your participants.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the importance of momentum when innovating. • To look at what builds momentum behind a project or idea, and what saps energy from a project or idea.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To consider the importance of momentum when innovating. • To look at what builds momentum behind a project or idea, and what saps energy from a project or idea. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of any size. Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: For this exercise you'll need to be able to split your participants into 2 teams, each with a different room to work in. You'll also need to gather a set of 'building materials' for each team. Typically, we provide each team with the following: • 20 'pick-up' sticks. • 3 pairs of scissors. • 4 rulers. • 6 sheets of A3 card (or 12 sheets of A4 card). • A ball of string. • A roll of sticky tape. You can vary the materials you provide in any way you wish - the important thing is that each team must have exactly the same materials to work with (including the same number of pairs of scissors etc). You'll also need a toy car for each team (each should be the same size and weight). Choose a car that is 'Dinky' sized, rather than 'Matchbox' sized. (More mature UK readers will know what we mean!) For those of you who don't, we mean a car that is not too small - aim for something about six or seven inches long and weighing about 1lb (500 gram). We want this exercise to be challenging. Notes: For very large groups (20 or more participants) you’ll need more than 2 teams. Establish a number of small teams with 4 or 5 participants in them, and some very large teams with perhaps a dozen participants in them.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise works really well within the engineering sector. Engineers love having the chance to build something and even their colleagues in support functions are accustomed to working with colleagues to troubleshoot issues. Dividing the group into as many teams as possible, (even teams of 2 work well), creates a great sense of competition. Although it is a fun exercise, when working with senior teams, it does underline the challenges in maintaining momentum when introducing large or long term change.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise with a group of junior managers in our business to help focus on their team work skills and learn more about their leadership style. I love the interactivity of this activity as it focused on the behaviours of the individual. The feedback session was very good, the team were able to be very honest and constructive which proved to be very effective.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise with a group of 15 managers with the view to encouraging the group to think outside the box and also to bring some fun into how they interact with eachother. It proved to be very effective as it also challenges the teams to provide feedback on the appointed team leaders. We replaced the car with a golf ball. The fact that the bridge had to allow for a team member to pass underneath created a fun atmosphere but it was interesting to see the competitiveness between both teams
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate the importance of taking a step back and understanding our role in the relationships we have with others at work.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate the importance of taking a step back and understanding our role in the relationships we have with others at work.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at supervisory level.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this material as part of a management course about building an effective team. I used this alongside the module Acts of Recognition. I feel it helped managers to think about how they currently relate to their team members, where there is room for improvement and how this can affect team performance. Useful scenarios which are very relevant to real-life in a busy working environment.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I really liked the use of case studies to explore how rapport works in practice and how easy it is in the workplace to let it slip. Before we reviewed the case studies, I added in a short exercise where I asked them to work in 3’s. Two people would have a discussion (about what they did last night), the 3rd would be an observer. At first the partner would listen well when in the conversation. Mid-way through they were directed to stop listening. The observer then fed-back about body language, speech patterns, attitude etc and how it affected the conversation. I found this really helped people ‘get into the case studies’ and imagine how the ‘characters’ felt.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider planning and preparation as part of leadership. • To facilitate discussion around playing to the team's strength. • To consider factors that motivate staff to perform well. • To encourage staff to self assess, review and reflect on performance. • To encourage leaders to consider their communication skills. • To encourage leaders to consider the question of keeping people motivated. • To demonstrate leadership skills in a practical task.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 55 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider planning and preparation as part of leadership. • To facilitate discussion around playing to the team's strength. • To consider factors that motivate staff to perform well. • To encourage staff to self assess, review and reflect on performance. • To encourage leaders to consider their communication skills. • To encourage leaders to consider the question of keeping people motivated. • To demonstrate leadership skills in a practical task.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: First line managers and supervisors.
You'll Need: • Broadsheet newspapers (one per team). • Sticky tape (one per team). • A tennis ball.
Notes: In this exercise, participants will be working in teams of 4 or 5. Each team will need one broadsheet newspaper (for example, the Financial Times) and a roll of sticky tape. In addition, you will need a tennis ball (or similar) to test the strength of the teams’ structures.
Label
Reviews |
|
I ran this as an icebreaker for a couple of reasons, firstly I had 1 manager on screen from our India team - and secondly we have some managers who are very hands on and do a lot of the doing, leaving them little time to lead their team.
It worked brilliantly by appointing the remote manager as a Team Leader as he couldn't physically contribute to the activity and choosing another manager for the opposite team that has a development need around stepping away and letting her team work through cases.
I used 5 sheets of flip paper per team (didn't have newspapers) and this worked perfectly.
The de-brief worked brilliantly, especially with targeted questions to the team leaders and "their team"
Lots of laughter, but a great focus on time management and linked to service level agreements we have, quality assurance, motivation and leadership.
I'll definitely be running this one again.
|
Helen McGowan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this activity for a teambuilding exercise and it really defalted the team. I think it is important for the team to be in close proximity even in separate rooms. I think it works better for the teams to be in the same room in corners of the room. A lot of running around for the facilitator and a lot of newspaper is needed!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
I've used this activity twice: once as a leadership exercise and once for teambuilding (requiring only a slight change in emphasis on the debrief). Students want to get straight onto the bridge-building phase rather than spend time on planning their bridge. However, when debriefed, they comment that they understand the importance of planning, and recognise that it's something they perhaps need to do better in their day jobs. This often comes from the team who don't succeed with the task - they acknowledge that better planning (and also leadership) could have helped. Using it as a leadership activity, you can focus in the debrief on the role of the leader, on leadership styles/approaches, and what it might have felt like had they not had a leader. For teambuilding, you can still draw out issues about leadership (because someone in the group might have evolved as a natural leader, without having been appointed, and this is something you might want to comment on) as well as focusing on the positives of teamworking - so if you are running this activity with a team who are not working well together, you could praise them (without patronising) on how well they worked together to build their bridge. It can be adapted easily with or without appointing a leader, or observers. I ran it with much shorter time-frames than recommended - only 10 minutes for planning and 20 minutes to build the bridge, but it still worked - it just got participants working harder and faster. There's a real energy in the room as teams strived to build a better bridge than their competitors! (You can always make the point of course, that they were asked to build a strong bridge, not to beat their competitors, but inevitably the element of competition will appear!). Leave the bridges on show for the remainder of the training course/week - they're a talking point. I even had one team nominating someone to "body pop" underneath the bridge to music from their iPod - real flair, creativity, leadership and teamworking coming out.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise very successfully when training a group of new managers on communication styles and teamwork. The exercise was very simple to run and needed very few props - and those which it did need were inexpensive and readily available - perfect!. The groups had a lot of fun and it was really interesting to notice the creative thought process - I guess the exercise could also be used for problem solving situations. We used an observer for each group who was able to give great feedback on the group dynamics and interactions - picking up on key words and phrases used which were useful - and of course, those which were not so useful. The exercise demonstrated the key learning that I wanted to draw out - it was quick - and the group had a load of fun doing it. Can't get better than that really.
|
Rosemary Taylor
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To identify the key skills that, collectively, constitute effective counselling skills for managers.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify the key skills that, collectively, constitute effective counselling skills for managers.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Managers and team leaders.
You'll Need: • Post-its.
Notes: This module is about a set of skills that can be used by managers to enable them to help individual's solve their own problems at work. These are collectively called counselling skills for managers. It is important to emphasise that there is a huge difference between using counselling skills in a work situation and being a counsellor. It takes many years training to become a counsellor.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
This isn't a training module as such, but an additional resource that can be used to support practical simulation exercises where the trainer or other participants fulfil the role of observer, making effective feedback easy and powerful.
About
This isn't a training module as such, but an additional resource that can be used to support practical simulation exercises where the trainer or other participants fulfil the role of observer. The Observer's Feedback Sheet contains a list of positive indicators in the left hand column and some less positive indicators in the central column. Observers simply tick the boxes for the behaviours they observe and jot down examples, making effective feedback easy and powerful.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To show the benefit of a mission statement when problem solving. • To demonstrate the importance of taking a step back and understanding our role in the relationships we have with others at work.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To show the benefit of a mission statement when problem solving. • To demonstrate the importance of taking a step back and understanding our role in the relationships we have with others at work.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and above.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: A useful module that looks at the importance of truly understanding the nature of the problem and the outcome desired. Useful for inclusion in any problem solving course, at the investigation stage of the problem solving process.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To agree what success looks like for everyone. • To establish effective working relationships within groups or teams. • To create a vision statement for the team.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 90 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 120 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To agree what success looks like for everyone. • To establish effective working relationships within groups or teams. • To create a vision statement for the team.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Staff at all levels working in a team. It is particularly well suited to new teams formed for a fixed period to manage/implement a project.
You'll Need: • Plenty of post-it notes and flipchart paper. • A selection of craft materials such as paints, brushes, glue, magazines, pieces of material. (You may prefer to restrict the materials available to coloured pens and paper, depending on the make up of the group you are working with.)
Notes: This module allows the group to share ideas about what is important to them and to agree some communal aim, values and aspirations. As a result of this exercise the whole team will participate in the creation of a shared vision. This activity can be used as a stand-alone activity or combined with others to form a longer event. The module Achieving a Shared Vision naturally leads on from this module.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I adapted this exercise slightly to use it with a group of people who had been TUPE transferred into the organisation. As they were a new team coming together from a range of different providers it was important that we brought them together quickly. The exercise was used in a 1/2 day strategy session. It created a lot of energy and helped the group not only come up with an agreed vision but it also highlighted how they had similar views / opinions despite coming from different backgrounds so worked with the team building element we were doing to (an unintended benefit). Fairly easy to do and very worhwhile
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
This activity can be a success, but I would suggest keeping in mind that not every participant would want to take part in such a creative exercise. I offered to run this for a client and they emailed me back saying that it wasn’t suited to their learning style and therefore wouldn’t be taking part! That said, as long as you're comfortable with the dynamic of the group you are working with then this is great activity for encouraging participants to think at a collective level about what success looks for them. Through moving from group to group it also provides an opportunity to begin to understand individual differences and priorities.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand how, and the extent to which, they involve others in the decision making process. • To help participants identify whether the decision making approaches currently used are the most effective. • To consider the pros and cons of using different approaches in different situations.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand how, and the extent to which, they involve others in the decision making process. • To help participants identify whether the decision making approaches currently used are the most effective. • To consider the pros and cons of using different approaches in different situations.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: • Prepared post-its. • Blank post-its of a different colour. • Prepared flipcharts.
Notes: You will need to familiarise yourself with the handout for this module before running it. You will also need to prepare a sheet of flipchart paper and a set of 10 post-its for each participant (see trainer notes).
Label
Reviews |
|
I ran the Decision Making Approaches module, it was brilliant. I followed the course guide and handouts. There were plenty of discussions and as a facilitator you made my job easy. It was very interactive and allowed for great discussion. Although there was quite a bit of prep work before the class, it made the session run very smoothly. I also arranged seating in three table settings, each with five participants who did not know one another, which helped with the ice-breaker. I was able to tie this session back to our Situational Leadership course as well as Myers-Briggs when discussing style.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To define counselling skills. • To build an understanding of the difference between counselling skills, the counsellor and a disciplinary interview. • To identify situations where the use of counselling skills might be appropriate.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To define counselling skills. • To build an understanding of the difference between counselling skills, the counsellor and a disciplinary interview. • To identify situations where the use of counselling skills might be appropriate.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Managers and team leaders.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To define success.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To define success.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Flipchart paper and lots of coloured pens.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This is my favourite icebreaker and the most flexible for various types of training; those who have completed this say that they hadn’t thought about what success had really meant to them before and [the exercise] helped them in the training to focus on what was important.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce participants to the subject of delegation. • To explore what constitutes effective and ineffective delegation. • To consider best practice when delegating. • To identify some pitfalls to avoid when delegating.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed within 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To introduce participants to the subject of delegation. • To explore what constitutes effective and ineffective delegation. • To consider best practice when delegating. • To identify some pitfalls to avoid when delegating.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Team Leaders and managers.
You'll Need: • Plenty of blank sheets of A4 paper.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Even with my poor amateur dramatic skills then this is a great exercise. It is fun to run, energises the group and as with all TL exercises generates powerful discussion and learning points. Have used this for years and everyone is always so proud of their boats and often take them home!
|
Emma Wynne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This session was brilliant. Such a visual and real activity that got everyone understanding how to effectively delegate. The frustration of so many of the delegates allowed for a very amusing activity which was enjoyed by all.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This activity worked brilliantly for stirring up responses.
I was very vague about what was expected in the boat building activity and then immediately made myself unavailable. The end result was really interesting - some delegates were so irritated they couldn't ask questions and with was such little information to go on they refused to build a boat. They felt it was a waste of time trying, because they just didn't know enough to do a good enough job. Brilliant for generating learning points.
Great thing was, there was an aeroplane in the fleet of boats, on the basis that, 'I know how to make a paper plane so I'd prefer to do that well, than make a bad boat'
This drove some really interesting behaviours.
|
Julia Anyan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I was delivering a course on delegation and needed to emphasise the point of poor delegation to the group that was in the training. This activity is excellent to do this. Sink or Swim is based around an imaginary organisation called Bob’s boats, where delegates are given A4 paper with little clear instruction and asked to build boats. The poor instructions and the role play that is used to demonstrate a lack of enthusiasm for their efforts is a great way to demonstrate how delegation should not be done. Everyone who did the exercise really enjoyed it, and it really made the delegates think about how delegation could be improved.
|
Shaun Gagie
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
It is always popular with delegates and shows brilliantly how poor delegation can lead to problems including frustration, confusion and most importantly not getting the job done that was wanted. It demonstrates the important learning points whilst being great fun – a brilliant mix. We have also used this for train the trainer courses in terms of not training people properly.
|
Emma Wynne
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Just a few thoughts on 'Sink or Swim'. I ran the exercise as part of a section on delegation with a group of team leaders - all of whom had expressed an interest in improving their delegation skills. The first section requires minimal materials - handouts, a supply of plain paper - and is easy to set up. After the initial shock, the delegates threw themselves into [the exercise] with varying degrees of success and enthusiasm while I was 'out to lunch'. The review of the exercise was very effective, bringing out how not to do it and for generating thoughts on more effective means of delegation. The next phase was an evaluation of what successful delegators do. This worked well with the review slides supplied with the exercise. The final part (the story around the Tsunami) worked well as a reminder about setting boundaries and empowering delegatees. I found the exercise took about forty-five minutes. At the end I also added some discussion and slides around the benefits of delegation and reasons why we don't delegate. These generated some 'lively' discussions. In future courses, I may have these discussions, before the exercise. All in all a really good exercise for delegates to experience and think about delegation. Thanks Trainers Library!
|
Nigel Baynes
|
|
I've used Bob's Boats which was a successful excercise for Delegation and left many of the participants actually wanting to finish making their boats after the course had finished! It was a good excercise to get everyone involved and participating and helped them understand the importance of always making sure that the tasks delegated have been followed up.
|
Previous Member
|
|
Bob's Boats always, always gets the most amazing response. One client I visit where I used it about 3 years ago I still get comments "here's Bob's or Burton's Boats". What fantastic recall.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 15 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30-45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A supply of Lego, with at least 15 large pieces for each team of 3-5 participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Building an Understanding of Delegation.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand what culture is and why it is important. • To encourage participants to actively consider and discuss the culture of their own organisation. • To elicit and compare the different perspectives that will exist about the organisation’s existing culture. • To consider the appropriateness of the organisation’s current culture to drive future business success (optional – for culture change workshops).
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60-90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand what culture is and why it is important. • To encourage participants to actively consider and discuss the culture of their own organisation. • To elicit and compare the different perspectives that will exist about the organisation’s existing culture. • To consider the appropriateness of the organisation’s current culture to drive future business success (optional – for culture change workshops).
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This activity is designed to provoke discussion around existing organisational culture, or to be used as an icebreaker for leadership programmes that contain a session on organisation or team culture. This activity is also suitable to be run as an internal facilitated session for organisations that are considering or are in the process of a culture change. This activity will encourage contribution and engagement from staff at all levels about current and future culture, and is equally suitable for senior managers and board directors. You will need to allow the longer time of 90 minutes if using the exercise as part of a culture change session.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To show participants a five-step model that will help them establish the need for a difficult conversation and plan for a successful outcome.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 15 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To show participants a five-step model that will help them establish the need for a difficult conversation and plan for a successful outcome.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Anyone.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To agree the important principles of effective delegation. • To review and learn from the experience of being delegated to. • To recognise potential barriers to delegation. • To prepare a checklist for effective delegation. • To identify tasks that can’t be delegated. • To plan for delegation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed within 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 120 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To agree the important principles of effective delegation. • To review and learn from the experience of being delegated to. • To recognise potential barriers to delegation. • To prepare a checklist for effective delegation. • To identify tasks that can’t be delegated. • To plan for delegation.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and junior managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: A useful discussion based exercise that encourages participants to really think about when to delegate, why to delegate and when not to delegate.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this exercise in management development programmes and it generates some very interesting discussion, revealing a great deal about how and what managers delegate. For the statements exercise I copied the statements onto pieces of card and asked them to sort the cards into 4 piles. This makes it easier for me to 'eavesdrop' on groups and see what decisions they have already made. I give them the sheet at the end to make any notes.
|
Helen Walker
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To raise awareness of self-awareness, the first strand of emotional intelligence.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To raise awareness of self-awareness, the first strand of emotional intelligence.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A flipchart, pens and the handouts provided.
Notes: This module forms part one of a two-part introduction to emotional intelligence. (Part 2 can also be used alone to explore awareness of others and empathy as a skill.) This module (Part 1) looks at intra-personal intelligence - self-awareness - and the ability to notice and regulate or manage our own emotional state or mood. Part 2 examines interpersonal intelligence – being able to distinguish other people’s emotions, moods and temperaments. It is important to have an understanding of emotional intelligence and the effects of discussing it with a group of participants. You will find Mike Bagshaw’s Article in Trainers’ Library useful for this.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Brilliant, easy to understand, and worthwhile activity to use with any level of employees. Taking the time to become self aware is the first step to becoming more emotionally intelligent, and this exercise really breaks that down.
Excellent!
|
Tracy Windross
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this module alongside part 2 with a group of staff who became more expressive with their emotions (at detriment to each other) following a period of change. It was a really useful, non-threatening introduction to self awareness before moving on to part 2.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I recently used this module for team leaders and deputy team leaders when delivering a session on Emotional Intelligence. The grades of emotions exercise worked very well. It was good to share how aware the delegates were of others emotions and how their own behaviour can influence others. I received a lot of positive feedback following the session.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 100 minutes.
Aims: • To develop an understanding of the importance of awareness of others, the second strand of emotional intelligence. • To allow participants to practice empathy as a skill.
About
Time: The exercises in this module can be completed in about 80 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 100 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To develop an understanding of the importance of awareness of others, the second strand of emotional intelligence. • To allow participants to practice empathy as a skill.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module forms Part 2 of a two-part introduction to emotional intelligence. This part examines interpersonal intelligence – being able to distinguish other people’s emotions, moods and temperaments. Part 1 looks at intra-personal intelligence - self-awareness and the ability to notice and regulate or manage our own emotional state or mood. This module can also be used alone, for example as part of a customer service skills course, to explore the importance and value of empathy as a skill. Before using this module it is important to have an understanding of emotional intelligence and the effects of discussing it with a group of participants. You will find Mike Bagshaw’s Article in Trainer’s Library useful for this.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module following part 1, for a team to be more aware about how their own emotions may affect others, and how they can empathise with each other. One of the learning points that came out was the fact they used these skills with their 'clients' but not with one another. I'm going to use it again as part of a Resilience session.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this module along with Part 1 Self-Awareness when running a session on emotional intelligence. The empathy exercise in this module worked really well it worked well to discus the difference between empathy and sympathy and how you don't have to agree with someone to be empathetic and what it felt like to get feedback with empathy and then with no empathy. i received some positive feedback following the session.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 105 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 70 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 105 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants. Ideally, you'll have at least 6 participants though so that you can create 3 teams of 2 or more.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: • Prepared flipcharts with simple 'cartoon' faces drawn on them - one face for each participant. • Post-it notes.
Notes: This exercise is designed for the start of an Employee Engagement workshop. Before the participants arrive – create a flip chart or charts with colourful cartoon faces on. Please have enough faces so that there is one for each participant. Have these on display at the start of the exercise. There are two parts to this exercise. It is essential that both are completed to ensure that learning is maximised.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This was a good exercise for looking at the difference between satisfaction, motivation and employee engagement. I used this exercise after first sharing and looking at what employee engagement was about and with hindsight I wish I had done the exercise first. All three teams really wanted to engage with staff not just satisfy - it was a great exercise, with effort and participation high (the presentations were brilliant)and Employee Engagement was top priority on the learning outcome. But maybe the learning of the differences between the 3 areas was a little lost - note to self do the exercise first next time :).
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I found this module very useful and received some positive feedback from the delegates. The Marvelous Zoo exercise worked really well looking at the three different approaches, satisfying staff, motivating staff and engaging staff and how it all fits together.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
A great module, I have used it twice and each time the result has been positive. The exercise enables the delegates to quickly identify the difference between satisfied, motivated and engaged employees. Great to use with the other modules. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 105 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage managers to identify the factors that will make their teams feel that they value the organisation they work for and are valued in return.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 70 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 105 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage managers to identify the factors that will make their teams feel that they value the organisation they work for and are valued in return.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: No additional materials are required but the final part of the exercise requires space for participants to move around the room.
Notes: The exercises allow space for participants to reflect on the engagement of a team of up to 15 employees. If their team is bigger than this, encourage them to think about their best and worst performing team members. Whilst this module can be run as a stand-alone exercise, it is most powerful when used with the other exercises in the Employee Engagement series. This complete course can be run in one day or in 4 bite-sized sessions.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module along side the part 1 'whats in it for me' I had a mix of experienced and inexperienced leaders. It was a good way of making them think about their team members and how they can increase the level of engagement in both the organisation and their job.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This module asks the delegates to consider their own team members and encourages them to consider ideas and suggestions on how to increase the levels of engagement on their teams. The Managers I was working with where inexperienced and I found they did needed quite a lot of direction. Very worthwhile and I would definitely use again. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the role that managers’ behaviours play in employee engagement. • To identify the behaviours that lead to more engaged teams. • To consider the impact this has on success.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 80 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore the role that managers’ behaviours play in employee engagement. • To identify the behaviours that lead to more engaged teams. • To consider the impact this has on success.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently).
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module along side employee engagement 1 and 2. The delegates enjoyed the behaviour cards exercise. The team leaders were quite surprised at how different the order of the cards came out and found that it was a good way of showing that you need to tailor your approach for each individual member of the team to get the best out of them. They also found the rosebud case study exercise beneficial.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants understand what it feels like to be engaged in their job and the difference it makes to how they feel and the quality of their work.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To help participants understand what it feels like to be engaged in their job and the difference it makes to how they feel and the quality of their work.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 16 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: • A Bridge Constructor Kit for each team. • A separate area for each team to work in, where they will be out of sight of the other team(s).
Notes: It is advisable to start this exercise without too much introduction – just hand out the briefings and let them get on with it. Whilst this works very well as a stand-alone exercise, we thoroughly recommend using it in conjunction with Employee Engagement 1, Employee Engagement 2 and Employee Engagement 3. .
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this several times on a management training programme when we focus on employee engagement. It has always been met with great enthusiasm and learning outcomes achieved whilst having fun. There have been some very imaginative wobbly bridges created. Great way to end a day.
|
Sue Bartlett
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I use this as part of a course on Employee Engagement. The delegates absolutely love the exercise. The difference in the results from the two groups is really striking. The de-brief at the end always helps highlight the importance of considering how we communicate with others and the impact on their levels of motivation, engagement and ultimately on what they produce. Making a direct connection between engagement and output really helps to focus managers minds on why employee engagement is so important. An excellent exercise, would highly recommend
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This exercise was a lot of fun and went down really well with a group of team leaders. It was good to see the different approaches used when building the bridge and the reactions when they realised they had slightly different briefs. It was really good on enfolding how much impact a manager has when engaging with their staff. I would defiantly recommend this exercise along with Employee engagement 1,2 and 3.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a really fun and interactive activity to help delegates understand the role of the manager in driving engagement. The debrief at the end of the session is extremely valuable in understand the impact engagement has on performance.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I did this activity in conjunction with the other Employee Engagement modules and it worked a treat. The learning was fantastic and the feedback was great. I can't wait to use again in the next few weeks. Excellent. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a fab activity that, when used in conjunction with the activity ‘Employee Engagement 4, really gets the ‘engagement’ message across. I haven’t used it for employee engagement (yet!) but I have amended the activity slightly and used it to explore member engagement. It went down really well with the participants, they enjoyed doing something different other than discussion etc and took a lot from the learning points of the activity. It particularly made them think about the importance of engaging others by moving out of their comfort zone when planning events rather than putting on events that they are comfortable with. I think this is going to quickly become one of my favourite activities.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Came across this just at the right time - very fortuitous! With some script adaption used this as a team building exercise within a health and social care context. Materials came from my 'Blue Peter' box as well as some of the recommended ones. Worked really well and was very powerful. Did exactly what it said on the tin! Another 5* product from Glasstap. How did I ever cope without you!!
|
Robert Corteen
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore how engaged participants are currently feeling at work. • To create an action plan for the workplace that will improve employee engagement.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore how engaged participants are currently feeling at work. • To create an action plan for the workplace that will improve employee engagement.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Work-based teams.
You'll Need: • The 10 Engaging Behaviours posters (Handout provided). 20 red counters (or similar) and 20 green counters for each participant. (We’ve provided a template should you wish to use paper counters.) • An envelope for each poster. (We recommend numbering these to make it easier to keep the poster and correct envelope together.)
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider how customers and staff view their organisation. • To identify cultural/image strengths and weaknesses within the organisation. • To generate discussion about how cultural/image strengths can be maintained, and how weaknesses might be overcome.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 45 minutes to complete (but can be shortened if necessary). In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider how customers and staff view their organisation. • To identify cultural/image strengths and weaknesses within the organisation. • To generate discussion about how cultural/image strengths can be maintained, and how weaknesses might be overcome.
Group Size: Fairly adaptable but we would recommend use with groups of less than 15 participants, working in two teams.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • One set of Feelings Cards per team. • Flipchart paper and marker pens for each team. • Blu-tack.
Notes: Use this as a catalyst for discussing how the organisation is currently viewed by its stakeholders, and how participants would like it to be viewed in the future.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Brand Reflection - How are we seen?.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the differences between a team and work group. • To help participants identify when a team or group is required.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To explore the differences between a team and work group. • To help participants identify when a team or group is required.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Teams, work groups and/or their leaders who wish to explore the current organisation and management of the group.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module can be usefully followed by the following modules: • Creating a Shared Vision. • Achieving a Shared Vision. It can also be a useful inclusion in any training intervention around remote teams.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the differences between bullying behaviour and that of firm management. • To understand the impact of organisational culture and norms on managers' behaviour.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore the differences between bullying behaviour and that of firm management. • To understand the impact of organisational culture and norms on managers' behaviour.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and team leaders.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: Different countries have different definitions of workplace bullying. You will find it helpful to check for yourself the current definition and any legislation or best practice guidelines applicable to your country and to have these available to share with your participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I've used this exercise for internal (same org) groups and mixed org and variable experience groups too.
It relies on the groups to have clear views and constructive discussion, which in some cases need nurturing and encouragement, however it does create a clear structure for the trainer to use as discussion points and lead anyone struggling.
It is particularly useful for reviewing cultural norms and expectations and for exploring the difficulty of the 'grey areas' which in some cases have led to heated (and valuable!) discussions around acceptable behaviours. it's often easier to spot the negative than the positive - and is helpful for learning from others' good techniques.
|
Helen Ettridge
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Have used this repeatedly with different levels of managers, and found most of them relieved that it’s OK to be a firm manager sometimes. As the worksheet says, some examples are obvious, but the themes like ‘people knowing where they stand’ were good to discuss. I extended it a bit by asking people to generate and/or review their own case study examples (anonymised first).
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce (or remind participants of) SMART objectives. • To give participants the opportunity to practice writing SMART objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 35 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To introduce (or remind participants of) SMART objectives. • To give participants the opportunity to practice writing SMART objectives.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module can be used to introduce SMART for participants who have not encountered the acronym before, or as a refresher for those who have.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To test participants' planning and communication skills. • To demonstrate the importance of listening and using summary and clarification to check understanding. • To consider what makes communication effective and the dangers of getting it wrong. • To energise a group of participants.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To test participants' planning and communication skills. • To demonstrate the importance of listening and using summary and clarification to check understanding. • To consider what makes communication effective and the dangers of getting it wrong. • To energise a group of participants.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Whistles (one for each team). • A stopwatch. • Skittles and hoops (or similar-see note). • Prizes.
We don't often develop exercises specifically for the outdoors, but this is a simple exercise that can be used by anyone with access to a park, lawn or yard. A great energiser for sunny days and one which really does contain some important lessons about communication and the importance of checking understanding.This exercise does require some preparation as you'll need to devise a 'course' for your participants to follow. Preparation will take about 5 minutes once you have the items you'll need. The course maps show three different routes through the same course, which means you won't have to change the course itself if playing more than one round. We suggest using hula-hoops for your 'pens'. If not, you can mark the 'pens' out using other things like rope or giant pick-up sticks. Skittles, cones or balls can be used to mark out the rest of the course.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Fantastic Activity for teambuilding, communication and leadership! I would use it over and over again. Simple to set up, and you can get creative with the equipment I used squeeky toys so when people had blind folds they would step on them which added even more humour to this activity. I would highly recommend this to any trainer that is teambuilding and has some space for the pens. I was a littly reluctant to use it at first as I had never used it before and have no sense of direction myself - once zoe explained the footprints and the direction of the footprints the penny dropped and away I went!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I had to run a Team Building event with the members of the Inbound Sales Teams; a couple of the Team Leaders were new to the company and the associates had recently been asked to make a few outbound calls at quieter periods, which they were not happy about. As a result they blamed the Team Leaders for not standing up for them. The situation had deteriorated a bit and it was time to bring the department together. I got my inspiration from Trainer's Library and I selected Glasstap Sheep Trials as an exercise. The results were amazing! The participants were a bit weary at the beginning and they were not talking too much amongst each other. By the time the first group started the exercise all participants were discussing the other group's performance amongst themselves and asking their team leader to communicate with them in a different way or using the same techniques if those were working. When the exercise finished I was very pleased to notice the complete transformation of the dynamics and communication of the department. There was laughter all round and they were all very keen to participate during the debrief. The questions suggested by Glasstap were fantastic at getting the message across and the relationship in the department improved dramatically as a direct result of the team building day. What a fantastic activity to run! Thank you Glasstap!!!!
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider their attitude. • To encourage discussion around optimistic versus pessimistic outlooks. • To recognise the impact that attitude has on performance. • To enable participants to identify personal traits that might be holding them back. • To encourage leaders to consider how they might deal with negative attitudes in their team.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider their attitude. • To encourage discussion around optimistic versus pessimistic outlooks. • To recognise the impact that attitude has on performance. • To enable participants to identify personal traits that might be holding them back. • To encourage leaders to consider how they might deal with negative attitudes in their team.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module provides an excellent opportunity, when working with a wide range of participants, to consider how attitude can impact on performance. Topics where the inclusion of a module looking at optimism/pessimism might be beneficial include: • Managing change. • Problem solving and decision making. • Customer service. • Selling skills. • Leading a team. • Strategic leadership. • Communication skills. • Planning and scheduling.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This is a very powerful activity the first part allows for self reflection on what the individuals preference tends to be - am I more half empty or half full? There are then a series of questions that give the group great discussion opportunities I have used this activity as part of managing change workshop and fits in really nicely in terms of what the individual can do to help themselves and how powerful their own attitude can be and how this might impact others and themselves.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I ran 'Half Full' as a stand-alone module to encourage people to think about the relative draw-backs and benefits of different perspectives on the world. As directed, the delegates completed the questionnaire on their own and then read the handout. They then started to answer the questions on their own too. One delegate found this very difficult so we stopped writing and opened the whole thing up as a discussion. Very quickly all delegates were involved in talking through the merits of pessimism and optimism. We identified some key learning points - not to bring up barriers when others don't act as you'd want, that optimists should think about analysing risk and pessimists can look to improve their outlook. We also had a very intense and productive debate about the value of constructive feedback and how one goes about it. All in all, the exercise 'did what it said on the can' and I've been delighted with it.
|
Tracy Croft
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the key steps in strategic planning. • To encourage participants to analyse financial and other data using a SWOT analysis. • To encourage participants to think about where they are now, before moving on in the next module to consider where they want to be.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 75 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 120 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants. It is strongly recommended that, for maximum impact and best overall use of time, this module is run in conjunction with the other modules from the Hotel Doldrums series.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the key steps in strategic planning. • To encourage participants to analyse financial and other data using a SWOT analysis. • To encourage participants to think about where they are now, before moving on in the next module to consider where they want to be.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will need a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. Hotel Doldrums can also be run as a teambuilding game, where teams are left to compete with less facilitator involvement during the exercise, but a thorough review at the end. This takes about 3.5 hours to run. If you prefer to use the teambuilding version of Hotel Doldrums, please download the trainer’s notes from the teambuilding games section of Trainers’ Library. This series of modules is set in the context of the hotel industry but requires no specialist knowledge of it. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this activity as part of a 2- day Business Skills module with a group of participants completing their Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award Scheme. I followed up with Part 2 and 3 and made a fabulous event. I added in a 'financial terms' quiz and some input on STEEPLE and SWOT before getting them to complete the activity.
It was really great to have the pack all produced and saved me so much time. The group completed the activities well and great learning about the importance of planning and not diving straight into the detail.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this with a team of Directors and Heads of Department as part of 2 Strategy days to encourage the team to think strategically as a team rather than functionally. I split the exercise over a day and a half and the timings worked well. I would recommend that if you are working with a group of people that you know well, that you chose the members of each team wisely. Although the financial information is not too complex, it is beneficial to have someone with an accountancy or commercial background in each team. If working with teams of consisting of just accountants, I would suspect that you could shorten the time taken. It has face credibility as a training exercise at senior levels.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Strategy Workshop framed around Hotel Doldrums
I used this series with a group of middle/senior managers from a variety of SME's - it was an open programme - and it worked very well. We used it across about 5hrs in total and it worked well - they worked through breaks and lunch to ensure that we got everything done - and they still really enjoyed the process. We left out the banker evaluations (as per the previous review) and it still worked well. This decision was made purely because of time constraints.
The data is not too much for them to take in and start working with and, as the trainer, I could quickly see who was "getting it" and who might be struggling more.
The key learnings the group shared from the exercise were:
Dont rush into determining your strategy - take time to collate the right data
Ask others - involvement breeds buy-in
Be creative in your strategy development - sometimes it has to be something radical to change direction
Conversley to the above point - sometimes, slight adjustment will bring rewards!
Agreeing a vision is tough - and if you are not part of the process, its easy to see how the statement can become "meaningless words on a page"
Its amazing how quickly you can get into something - they seemed fully engaged on running a hotel by the end of it.
|
Rosemary Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To give participants the opportunity to identify and explore options and appraise these. • For participants to create a 3-5 year outline strategic plan based on the fictional case study they’ve been given.
About
This module follows on from Hotel Doldrums, part 1, and is not designed to be used as a stand-alone module.
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 135 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 180 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants.
Aims: • To give participants the opportunity to identify and explore options and appraise these. • For participants to create a 3-5 year outline strategic plan based on the fictional case study they’ve been given.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in conjunction with Part 1 and 3 as a two day Business Skills session for participants completing their Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award. A great team activity to encourage some strategic thinking and planning. The structure of the session makes it easy to follow and I added in some of the creative thinking tools and decision making tools from other Glasstap activities so everything came together really well. Having the materials all prepared is so easy and saved me so much time in my course preparation.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 240 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to develop a strategy from the options generated in previous sessions. • To encourage participants to prepare and give a persuasive presentation outlining their strategy and the work they have done. • To reflect on the learning from the Hotel Doldrums series of modules.
About
This module follows on from Hotel Doldrums, parts 1 and 2, and is not designed to be used as a stand-alone module.
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 140 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 240 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants.
Aims: • To encourage participants to develop a strategy from the options generated in previous sessions. • To encourage participants to prepare and give a persuasive presentation outlining their strategy and the work they have done. • To reflect on the learning from the Hotel Doldrums series of modules.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this activities as part of a 2 day Business Skills Programme for participants on a Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award Scheme. Having completed part 1 and 2, this was a great way to end the session. Some great learning and an opportunity for them also to present and identify further development needs.
I kept it quite high level throughout so we didn't get too bogged down in the financials, focussing more on how they developed their ideas and presented them in a way that was helpful for their learning, so our bank managers adopted a more holistic approach and giving feedback based on some sound business ideas but also passion and energy!
A great activity and the materials saved me hours if not days in preparation time. The debrief questions were also helpful throughout to ensure we got lots of learning and practical application to take back to work.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I facilitated this, along with Parts 1 and 2 at a recent leadership workshop for business owners. It was fantastic and they all really loved it. I ran all three parts in one day, so condensed it quite a bit (we had previously spent time on analysing a business and how to develop a strategy, so it was mostly a 'putting it all together' day). Due to their personalities and entrepreneurial nature, they wanted to jump straight to part 3, which provided a valuable lesson in itself! They all found it so useful and easy to relate it to their own businesses too.
|
Jennifer Lindsay-Finan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate a link between self-belief and results. • To encourage participants to consider the impact positivity has on their own performance and the performance of others.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate a link between self-belief and results. • To encourage participants to consider the impact positivity has on their own performance and the performance of others.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A syndicate room, or separate area in which Team 1 can work. • A pack of 54 ‘Filing Frenzy’ cards for each team. • A stopwatch/timer. • You might like to use a bell or whistle to announce the start/end of the exercise.
Notes: This exercise may not be suitable for participants who are colour blind or visually impaired. However, in most cases anyone who falls into this category can still be involved. Ask them to observe/listen to the teams during the exercise, identifying effective and less effective behaviours in order to provide constructive feedback afterwards.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce a 'model' to help participants remember what counselling skills are, and how to use them.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To introduce a 'model' to help participants remember what counselling skills are, and how to use them. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants. Useful For: Managers and team leaders. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 35 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider the value and difficulty caused by organisational politics and political games. • To create an understanding that managers cannot avoid politics and so need to know the games in which they may – deliberately or inadvertently – be playing.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 35 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider the value and difficulty caused by organisational politics and political games. • To create an understanding that managers cannot avoid politics, so need to know the games in which they may – deliberately or inadvertently – be playing.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with larger groups of up to almost any size. It tends not to work well with very small groups.
Useful For: All managers, but particularly those who are new to management and may not understand the political nature of organisations, including their own.
You'll Need: • Post-it notes, flipchart paper, scribble paper, pens and marker pens for each team.
Notes: This module works best if you set up the room ‘cabaret style’ – that is with table teams of between 4 and 8 people per table. This is the first in a series of three modules examining power and politics. It can be used on its own as a short session or with the other two to form a complete half day programme. Politics is often seen as a ‘dirty word’ by many people, or as one in which they have no interest. The purpose of this module is for the participants to recognise that divorcing themselves from politics is a decision that could affect them adversely – and is, in itself, a political act. To influence the direction an organisation is taking means people taking part in politics.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to understand that the words power and influence are, essentially, interchangeable. • To help participants understand that power is an asset that can be used to help deliver positive change. • To help participants understand that there are many sources of power and where their own power to influence comes from.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to understand that the words power and influence are, essentially, interchangeable. • To help participants understand that power is an asset that can be used to help deliver positive change. • To help participants understand that there are many sources of power and where their own power to influence comes from.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with larger groups of almost any size. It tends not to work well with very small groups.
Useful For: All managers, but particularly those who are new to management and may not understand that power comes from many different sources, not just authority.
You'll Need: • The Activity Link and your PIN from the My Account section of the member homepage.
Notes: This is part two of three modules looking at influence, politics and power. It can be run on its own or combined with the other two modules to make a complete half day programme. If you do not have an internet connection in your training room, we’ve included the transcript of the story (Handout 2).
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To allow participants the opportunity to identify their own sources of power, to know which they need to develop and to have an action plan for doing this.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 80 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To allow participants the opportunity to identify their own sources of power, to know which they need to develop and to have an action plan for doing this.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants.
Useful For: All managers but especially those who are new to the management role and may feel that they have little power of their own to allow them to accomplish results.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is the third in a series looking at influence, power and politics. Whilst this module can be run on its on, it will have more effect if used as a follow on to the work done in Influence 2 - Sources of Power. If you are running this module on its own and not as a follow-on, you will find it helpful to have looked at the five power sources identified in the Influence 2 - Sources of Power module before you begin.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module. Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants. Useful For: Participants with current (or imminent) managerial responsibility. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise is a great way to open up a workshop about leadership. It removes the need for the more traditional participant introductions and enables you to observe the participants in action and explore their priorities and attitudes to managing people. You can run this exercise with a range of team sizes, with between 4 and 8 players in each team. Please select the correct Clue Card pack based on the number in the team. Choose the team sizes that work for you. For example, with a group of 15, the exercise can be run with 3 teams of 5 or 2 teams, one of 7 and the other 8.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in a Leadership workshop and it was helpful to get people to think about what a leader needs to do when taking action with the team and its development. All of the teams came up with different priorities which sparked off considerable discussion about what areas to prioritize especially if you are a new manager. You really need to help at the start with communication as some groups were not sure what to do and you may need to lead them to sharing their clues. It was a good exercise in communication and collaboration. Make sure you have enough time for any groups that may not complete the grid as quick.
As part of the preparation we did adapt the tool by including some of the titles in the box e.g. the 12 month goals and feedback and I am glad we did as quite a few participants had never used this style grid before and they still ended up getting bogged down in completing the grid - even with this additional help. It is important that they get time to discuss their first actions rather than just completing the grid.
The exercise highlights the importance of focusing on the positives within a team rather than spending time on the negatives.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I ran this exercise as an icebreaker for the launch workshop of a new Management Development Program. It worked well to get the participants working together, although there was a period of time at the start where no one seemed to know what they had to do, which was slightly uncomfortable as the participants didn't all know each other. I dealt with this by saying "someone in the team knows what to do".
The different approaches taken by the two team was interesting. One team tackled it exactly as I would - filling out all the categories and then cross-referencing the information to complete the grid. The other team were focused on going through each name and trying to complete the whole information one person at a time. I was sure this wouldn't work, but somehow it did! I think they must have made the connections by reading out the info several times. It was useful to bring out a learning point about letting people tackle problems in their own way, and that my way is not always the only way! I did drop in some helpful comments, e.g. steering them away from guessing at answers and telling them that all the facts they needed were provided.
On the less positive side, the "feedback" items and goals are not super clear and took a bit of working out.
A good exercise to lead into a discussion of managing vs leading though and I will definitely be using it again.
One other small point - if the size of the cards could be made the same on all the sheets that would make me happy!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
We used this module to set the tone for a leadership programme targeted at new leaders.
The group did not know one another so it served well as an ice-breaker. But more importantly it set the tone for our discussion around the differences between leading and managing. Previously we started this programme without this exercise and there was a lot of confusion around the differing roles of managers and leaders.
The materials are set out really well, though I would recommend plenty of spares as participants tended to request additional grids as they made errors.
Also, I think be clear about what you are trying to achieve. If your priority is completion of the activity then the time limit is great. If you would like more focus around the actual debate of “who your priorities are” then I would suggest the facilitator assists more and more so that they have around 10-15mins for discussion at completion of the grid, however each group is different.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To identify the key 'don't' when using counselling skills at work.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To identify the key 'don't' when using counselling skills at work. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of almost any size. Useful For: Managers. You'll Need: • Glue or double sided sticky tape.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 65 minutes.
Aims: • To provide participants with a way of understanding behaviour and improving communication. • To provide a very basic introduction to transactional analysis.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 65 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To provide participants with a way of understanding behaviour and improving communication. • To provide a very basic introduction to transactional analysis.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff up to junior managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is intended to provide a very simple introduction to transactional analysis, a theory developed by Eric Berne in the 1950s. If you are not familiar with transactional analysis you will need to read through all the notes carefully plus the additional material in the handout. Go through the exercises on your own first so that you can see the rationale. If you have time, try to observe the different types "in play" in your own interactions with people.
Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great simple introduction to Transnational Analysis, helping individuals see what their dominant ego state may be and how they communicate may influence a particular response. I have used this for an introduction to management, communication skills and assertiveness courses. I also have two sets of three circles laminated and place them on the floor to get some movement through the ego states - gets people thinking about where they are communicating from and therefore what invitation they are giving others. Simple yet powerful!
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Straight forward introduction to TA that you can pick up and
run with. The check for
understanding exercise is good as people can ‘see’ TA in action. And the
dominant states exercise was good.
Personally I added a little bit about the functional model
as I find it helps people get their minds around the positive and negative
parent and child states. But that
was easy to add into this activity.
The complementary or crossed communications exercise was helpful, and again
to make it a little more practical I gave them discs and sticks and got them to map out the transactions to
help their thinking process with each example. Found this worked well.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I used this material in a coaching workshop for managers. The exercise was used in the context of giving effective feedback and what problems may occur when our communication style is crossed rather than parallel to the person we’re working with. It is structured such that the topic of transactional analysis is very easy to understand and everyone was able to identify with the states of being an Adult, Child or Parent. It begins with an exercise to consider what your reactions would be in five situations - which you later come back to and label the state in which you responded – many people were surprised that many of their immediate reactions were very much in a Child state! I followed this exercise with a coaching role-play, where the manager had to give feedback to an ‘employee’ about his/her performance which helped the participants to use a more appropriate state when giving feedback.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants develop their negotiation skills and in particular their ability to establish their needs and wants, and those of the other party, prior to commencing negotiating.
About
Time: This game can be played in about 90 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion and evaluation, we recommend allowing 120 minutes.
Aims: • To help participants develop their negotiation skills and in particular their ability to establish their needs and wants, and those of the other party, prior to commencing negotiating.
Skills and Behaviours Tested: Communication skills, leadership, negotiation, teamwork and collaboration, and problem solving.
Group Size: This exercise involves participants working in four teams. You’ll need a minimum of 2 participants in each team and a maximum of 6.
Useful For: Managers, and particularly those at a more senior level.
You'll Need: • Access to the Internet, to use our online scoring tool, necessary to assess teams’ performances and a printer to provide participants a copy of the results. (Only you will need this, not your participants.) • Plenty of space. Ideally each of your four teams will have a separate breakout room to work in. • A calculator for each team. • Highlighters, pens and pencils for each team. • A small prize for the winning team. • A bell (optional).
Notes: The exercise can also be used at the end of a training event focused on negotiation, allowing participants to apply new knowledge and skills.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have to agree with a previous reviewer that this exercise is a great concept, however it falls down because it is over complex. I have had a high degree of success using Glasstap Case Studies and Exercises with a team of capable Directors and Senior Managers, however "Jess Blonde" confused them and they failed to grasp the key points, getting somewhat lost in the film world details. However, I feel that with a clearer brief and fewer parameters for success, this could work well with senior people.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have enjoyed using products from Glasstap to date, however I'm sad to say that this one, Jess Blonde, did not work well with my group of 9 reasonably experienced negotiators today. The main issue - it's way too complex, so people spent most of the time trying to work out how on earth the film market works, and no where near enough time trying the negotiation tactics I'd been teaching them. As a result, it also went way over time. I did it in 4 chunks instead of all in one go, and I'd estimate it tool at least 3 hrs all up. Would love to see it reworked as a more simple version.
|
Rob Pyne
rated this item with 2 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the benefits of different approaches to developing others. • To help participants choose the most appropriate approach for developing others in a given situation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore the benefits of different approaches to developing others. • To help participants choose the most appropriate approach for developing others in a given situation.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Team Leaders, supervisors and managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is suitable for anyone who has responsibility for developing others in the workplace: Team leaders, supervisors or managers. It is a useful addition to coaching skills courses and can help participants understand when a coaching approach might be appropriate and when it might not be.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great short exercise to help leaders to manage their approach to various members of their team. I used it as part of a 2 day course on Coaching in the Workplace most recently.
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Great simple explanation and activity that helps managers to assess which technique of development to use in different situations with different individuals in their team. Simple and effective way of getting managers to reflect on their own team using generic scenarios. Great introduction to Coaching skills for managers course or team development.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage new managers to think about which of their team members they are most worried about managing and begin to identify actions they can take to manage them effectively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage new managers to think about which of their team members they are most worried about managing and begin to identify actions they can take to manage them effectively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Brand new managers (or those who soon will be), and particularly those that have been promoted from within the team.
You'll Need: • Post-it notes, glue, sellotape and Blu Tack. • Playdough or other modelling clay. • Large flat (plain) wooden lolly sticks. • Colourful pipe cleaners. • Art equipment.
Notes: This is an introductory module or icebreaker for new managers. It is designed to build awareness of participants’ fears and concerns, gather initial ideas and explore the personal learning each participant needs to get from the training that follows. If using this module with larger groups, more time will be needed for debriefing the exercise; alternatively, you can ask them to work in pairs during the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this activity as an introduction exercise to Managing Difficult People which works really well, gets individual to relax into talking about the challenging people/situations they are facing without having to get too specific and gets some energy and fun in to a fairly emotive subject.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To explore what motivates us. • To identify ways of maintaining motivation.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To explore what motivates us. • To identify ways of maintaining motivation. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: • A pre-prepared flipchart and coloured flipchart pens. Notes: For this module, you will need to pre-prepare a flipchart with a grid (an example is shown on the summary sheet of the trainer's notes). Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A great exercise for developing learning around motivation and the motivational theories. It really highlights what is a motivator and the group scoring exercise supports the theorists. We also looked at Maslow's hierarchy and Vrooms Expectancy theory.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I really enjoyed using this Motivators exercise in a Managing Good Performance course I ran. It really starts to get delegates to understand their own motivators and how they can use this to support their teams motivators!
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
The discussion questions worked really well! As did the ranking exercise – that really demonstrated the different priorities we have. I had already done some work with the groups that I used this with around personality types and their answers to the ranking exercised helped endorse this work too! I did find a great sample slide on the internet showing the hygiene and motivating factors that really brought Hertzberg to
life. Easy to use, experiential activity great for managers of all levels!
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Used this exercise on management programmes to help delegates understand that there are a number of factors which affect our inherent motivation. It builds very well on understanding different people styles as then the group can understand why there are variances in their responses. Again, as with so many other modules, the exercise was simple in execution, did not need "specialist" equipment and provided the learning points easily and readily. This exercise generates great discussion around motivation and how, as managers, we need to tap into something beyond just financial reward.
|
Rosemary Taylor
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to identify an appropriate management style based on the individual they are dealing with, the role they are doing and what the team needs them to do.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to identify an appropriate management style based on the individual they are dealing with, the role they are doing and what the team needs them to do.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Participants who have managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently).
You'll Need: • Post it notes and Blu-Tack. • Lengths of string about 1 metre/3 feet long. (You’ll need two lengths for each team of 3 or 4 participants.) • Plenty of space.
Notes: This exercise can work as a stand-alone training exercise for new managers. It is designed to look at the role of the manager and explore suitable approaches for managing individual team members. You will need to clear a large space (on the floor or on tables) for the main part of the exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
We recently launched a new management programme and we ran this activity, it was a really great way for them to understand their people and help them create an action plan for themselves in their new role.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Used this with a group of young managers. Worked well. Would comment that there are a lot of parts of this module, and it's easy to run longer than indicated.
|
Rob Pyne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 100 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 180 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: Although the whole module may take 3 or more hours to run, this is comprised of several smaller sessions that can, if necessary and appropriate, be separated. This module is appropriate for anyone who needs to set and achieve goals in the workplace, their career or their personal life. You may find it helpful to work through the definitions set out in the first session and apply them to a goal of your own, so that you have a personal example to share with participants if they are a little reluctant to discuss their own goals. Session four is a long session (2 hours) that takes participants through the goal setting process and allows time for them to define and describe in detail their goal(s). It is split into several sub-sections (linked to the stages of goal setting) for ease of use. The timing of a break is suggested but it may be taken at any time during this session, as convenient for the group.
Label
Reviews |
|
This a simple goals setting activity which works however I found bits of it a bit long winded. Great for SMART goal seeting for managers new to managing. It is very thorough and sets out a good process for SMART goals.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
In defining goal setting I added in an essence exercise to get people to generate their own definitions, and a more practical demonstration of why goals are important (as otherwise I found it a bit too passive/sedentary). However, I really liked the way the module describes aim, goal and objective and the section on accentuating the positive (though I adapted the slide examples to suit my personal style). The final section on actually implementing goal setting was good. Some delegates found it really difficult, but the framework provided by this module helped most learners grasp the stages. All in all a good all encompassing look at why and how to set effective goals.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 30 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the importance of integrity when delivering a presentation.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 10 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 30 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the importance of integrity when delivering a presentation.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module uses characters that overseas customers might not recognise. However, it can easily be adapted by substituting the characters we've used with well-known characters that your audience will be familiar with.
Label
Reviews |
|
This was a really useful way for learners to consider 'practicing what they preach' when delivering presentations. I hadn't really considered this topic before accessing the material (and I've been delivering presentations for a long time)! Great food for thought for learners.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore different styles of leadership and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. • To understand how to successfully apply each of the leadership styles, as appropriate, in the workplace.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore different styles of leadership and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. • To understand how to successfully apply each of the leadership styles, as appropriate, in the workplace.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Team leaders, managers and those aspiring to management roles.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: For this module you will need sufficient space for participants to work together in small teams.
Label
Reviews |
|
As part of our Leadership vs Management workshop I used this to help embed the different styles of Leadership that can be used. There were really good discussions around the styles with most attendees talking about their preferred style. The case study really helped everyone to see the differences and the potential impacts when using them. It really highlighted the need to adapt your style depending on the circumstances and encourages you to look at the big picture and what you want to achieve. Would definitely recommend for leadership training.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I found this case study, well written and it evoked good discussion amongst our Leadership Team. Different sessions sometimes found it hard to distinguish between Autocratic/Transactional, but an experienced trainer was able to talk through each one highlighting the “give-away” points to reach consensus. The case study is long & detailed enough to be used in adult/corporate education, yet short enough to move through the exercise within a given timeframe. I didn’t use all the discussion questions and we didn’t focus on what Nicola “should” do. Instead I wrote the Learning Points on a flipchart (rather than the handout) and added one about our company working as a team and Leaders can get the best out of a situation when they work with everyone’s strengths. Our summative task after the case study was to look at the different leadership styles and when they are appropriate within our organization.
|
Preayant Kumar
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Looking at leadership styles/approaches through the use of a case study. An experienced facilitator can work wonders with this exercise, enabling students to talk about leadership styles. For example, I had one group who said they didn't like the "transformational leader", but when we explored this further, they realised it wasn't what she was suggesting that they didn't like, it was more that the situation she was trying to help someone else resolve had been badly managed and could have done with a transformational approach from the start. This exercise promotes good discussion amongst the groups, and it's really important to allow time for this to happen before you bring students back together for their views and debrief. I handed out the "Learning Points handout" but students didn't fill this in as they had already been asked to record their group views during their discussion (it seemed like duplicate work). However, the handout would be useful if you wanted students to take more time to reflect on their own styles and spend a few quiet minutes making their own notes. I didn't go through every discussion question with the group, as suggested on the trainer's notes - partly because I was timebound, but partly because I thought there were too many questions. I found it useful to focus on a couple of key questions about each leader and then to encourage students to reflect and comment on their own styles. The exercise more than ably makes the point that an "adaptive" leadership style is best. It can be done comfortably within 60 minutes. The case study was short enough for students to digest.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I love this case study and have used it many times with all different levels of managers. I tend to send them away into break out rooms in teams to create flip chart presentations on their views on the three different styles (pro’s & con’s) and what Nicola should do (their plan of action) for half an hour in total. The teams then present all the styles pros and cons back to the group and we all discuss KLPs. After that they each present their plans of action for Nicola and we discuss as a group. I’ve found it quicker this way and easier to manage and they all seem to find this a realistic and useful discussion about adaptive leadership. It also allows them to gently nickname each other a bit of a “Steve” or a “Jenny” and have a laugh while recognising their differing strengths and weaknesses.
|
Melody McMillan
|
|
This module is EXCELLENT! I used it as part of a leadership skills course, but subsequently have also included in a Supervisory Skills course because it helps to explain so much about how we manage and how others see us. The case study has been brilliantly written so that each of the characters have very different qualities and can easily be identified! Using the module has led to vast amounts of conversation and learning and has really enhanced the course. I would advise changing the structure slightly, so that you cover each character in full, in turn. So layout at the moment goes through identifying each style, then identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each style. I have covered both elements under each character so that the conversation flows more. I have also had to allow slightly more time (having cut down the original recommendation) and have now gone back to the timings it states! The character names themselves have now become “catchphrases” throughout the company and its not unusual to hear, “oooo, now who's being a Steve”!
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the pitfalls and dangers of giving advice when helping staff solve their own problems. • To consider the dangers of making judgements or assumptions about the nature of someone else's problem.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider the pitfalls and dangers of giving advice when helping staff solve their own problems. • To consider the dangers of making judgements or assumptions about the nature of someone else's problem.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Managers and team leaders.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Endorsed by The National Association of School-Based Teacher Trainers, NASBTT.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise is great way to highlight the importance of making sure your own biases doesn't get in the way during coaching.
|
Lottie Skuthe-Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This is a good way of discussing some of the pitfalls of well-intentioned 'helping' behaviours. It is a very interesting exercise as it highlights things that seem innocuous, but can undermine the processes. I have used it as part of an introduction to coaching or action learning sets, as a intermediate step before setting them off coaching each other. It allows the managers to see that there are a range of responses, some bad enough to get a laugh, which presented in the right way takes the pressure off them before practical work.
|
Helen Walker
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider the art of feedback and to ensure their feedback is appropriate and objective. • To enable participants to identify useful, helpful, constructive feedback. • To clarify what makes useful, constructive feedback. • To develop participants ability to give constructive feedback. • To consider how it feels to be on the receiving end of destructive or unhelpful feedback.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed within 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider the art of feedback and to ensure their feedback is appropriate and objective. • To enable participants to identify useful, helpful, constructive feedback. • To clarify what makes useful, constructive feedback. • To develop participants ability to give constructive feedback. • To consider how it feels to be on the receiving end of destructive or unhelpful feedback.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: The suggested time for this module is based on the assumption that pre-work has covered the essential elements of positive feedback. The activity is designed to help participants improve their ability to offer feedback in a way that is constructive and helpful and leads to positive performance. It works particularly well following the Introduction to Feedback
module in Trainers’ Library.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This activity is very useful in my 'Being the manager' training course. I use it during the section relating to manageing your staff's performance. Managers often dislike having to give feedback that may not be what the employee wants to hear, however this activity gives our new managers a starting point in giving constructive feedback, taking into account emotional intelligence and empathy. A great training module.
|
Tracy Windross
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have recently used this exercise as part of an in-house Mentoring Skills session for those staff who, in particular, mentor new employees. It is very straightforward to run and really challenges people on being specific about what someone has done (good or bad). I found I did need to emphasise the point about the participants putting their own context on the feedback statements – telling them to think about situations in their departments really helped. When reading out the suggested alternatives statements, I asked the participants to say it to me as if I was the person getting that feedback in real life. It’s more of a stretch for the members of the group in that way – and they have to work on their eye contact and sincerity too!
|
Previous Member
|
|
I use this exercise both in management development courses and as a part of personal effectiveness courses. I find it very helpful to give some forms of words that help them think about structuring better feedback as well as some less good, but more common (and less effective) examples of feedback that they can improve. Asking them to do that in groups enables them to feedback with more confidence and provides us with a variety of responses, I tend to give them the first couple to do one at time and feedback after each one in order that they hear a variety of responses that improve the quality of their later suggestions. I follow this up with asking them to script a piece of feedback they want to give to a member of their team, with an opportunity to try it out and ask for feedback.
|
Helen Walker
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To consider what needs to be communicated when change is initiated. • To explore the need to convince those affected by change of the need for change and its urgency. • To consider methods that can be used to achieve buy-in to change programmes.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 80 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider what needs to be communicated when change is initiated. • To explore the need to convince those affected by change of the need for change and its urgency. • To consider methods that can be used to achieve buy-in to change programmes.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a two-part Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called Selling Change - Introduction and Selling Change (R).
Label
Reviews |
|
The handouts mention Bernie Leslie and Francis - However in the materials they are referred to as Bernie Bob and Cilla. Just beware...
I had a call from Glasstap by return and the materials have now been amended (Excellent service) - Great module!
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To welcome participants to the course. • To introduce the facilitator and participants to each other. • To discover the participants needs. • To encourage interaction and discussion. • To practise writing SMART objectives.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 40 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50-60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To welcome participants to the course. • To introduce the facilitator and participants to each other. • To discover the participants needs. • To encourage interaction and discussion. • To practise writing SMART objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and above.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module provides a long introduction to courses, but is particularly useful where the concept of SMART objectives is important to the training being delivered. It provides an ideal introduction to performance management training for example.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in a recent time management session and found it was the one area of the session that didn't excite. Most understood it therefore felt I was going over old ground. Not one of the more inspiring or creative sessions.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
I used this session with a mixed experienced group of managers all from the same company. Surprisingly at the beginning of the session 8 out of 10 said they were familiar with setting SMART goals however at the end they all commented that they didn't really appreciated the value and had not been setting SMART goals or objectives. The exercise really got them thinking and although they found it challenging it made the points quickly.
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
We had an issue in that staff had been asked to ‘coach’ using SMART rather than a specific coaching model such as e.g. GROW. In practice they did neither, as they were not familiar with what SMART actually meant (broken down) and then HOW to make SMART work for them. I wanted to emphasise and familiarise people with what SMART actually is and how to use it appropriately. The module clearly outlines in some detail what the ‘specifics’ of SMART are, more importantly it offers a very clear exercise with numerous examples to reinforce the process. This was actually sufficient but I used the fact that was promoted ‘Specific works better in a financial situation’ to ensure two things happened – firstly that they could ensure that their ‘specific’ objective was in fact a realistic, tangible and measurable outcome. This made a huge difference to their choice of ‘specific’. The second result from this realisation which you can then reinforce is, that they actually then use SMART in support of a realistic business coaching outcome. Satisfying both the learning outcomes with which I was challenged at the very outset.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the extent to which staff feel engaged with the organisation they work for. • To consider who staff feel is responsible for business performance. • To think about how vision and values are used within the organisation. • To demonstrate how values can be ingrained in the organisation. • To consider the benefits of an organisation where staff feel engaged and responsible for the business outcomes.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 60 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the extent to which staff feel engaged with the organisation they work for. • To consider who staff feel is responsible for business performance. • To think about how vision and values are used within the organisation. • To demonstrate how values can be ingrained in the organisation. • To consider the benefits of an organisation where staff feel engaged and responsible for the business outcomes.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: For this exercise you will need a good quantity of greeting card making materials. For example: Glue, Double sided tape or pads, Scissors, Card of various colours and textures, ribbon of various colours and gold/silver markers. You'll need enough materials for each team of 4-6 participants to make one 'template' card and one 'team' card of their own design.
Notes: This exercise was first used at the 2008 Trainers' Library Conference and has been designed around the five 'passions' that underpin our business. It's an unusually personal module that we've used to share some of the key principles and approaches that we believe have been key to the success of Glasstap. It's been added to Trainers' Library in response to requests from participants who attended the conference. You can use the five values we’ve suggested for the exercise to great effect, but the exercise can be easily adapted to your own organisation’s vision and values. However, we strongly recommend limiting the number of values used in this exercise to 6 or fewer. If your organisation doesn’t have a clear set of values or principles, you could use an exercise like ‘Feelings Cards’ to generate discussion around people’s values and to identify some possible organisational values for the future.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called The E-Card Factory - Balancing Business with Values.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this as part of an induction program when participants were joining an organisation with a real passion for their values.
It was a good way to introduce the concept of values and why they matter. It enabled us to have an honest and open debate about what people really thought about values and was a creative way to tackle some quite interesting viewpoints in an open and constructive way.
Although the trainer notes say it is aimed at managers, I would say more junior members of staff would get value from it too (& possibly more so)
|
Frances Ferguson
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To explore what participants can do to improve their own levels of engagement.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore what participants can do to improve their own levels of engagement.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore perceived differences and similarities between leadership and management. • To explore the relationship between leadership and management.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 40 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore perceived differences and similarities between leadership and management. • To explore the relationship between leadership and management.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Team leaders and managers, or those who soon will be.
You'll Need: • A set of ‘Identikit Cards’ for each team.
Notes: For this module you will need sufficient space for participants to work together in teams of four, preferably whilst remaining in the main training room.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Used this for management development training - Leadership vs management was the first workshop. This was a great exercise to explore the difference between the two and understanding the importance of doing both. Great introduction in learning about transformational and transactional leadership.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This activity worked quite well. We followed it up with discussion about David Marquet intent-based leadership. It was easy to facilitate and easy to adjust timings to fit in with your programme. Laminating the cards makes it easier for reuse. We did have one online attendee and we issued the remote version which was helpful.
|
Zoe Horwood
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I liked this activity it really gets individuals to think about the difference between leaders and managers and the overlap. This is done in a fun and simple way. The discussion and debate is really valuable and really gets them to think about where the different descripters go. I would say 90% of the value of this activity is in the discussion. Probably best to laminate the Identikit so you can use it over and over again. If you don’t want to cut out then you can just give the list and get them to write up on a flip chart where the different descriptions should go.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
A good starter exercise. Have used it mainly within organisations and have found that mostly people from the same organisation have similar views (so there wasn’t much debate to be had). However, the organisations I was working with have very high retention rates and most of the learners have been working for the organisations for a long time. Which might explain the similarities in views. I did find I didn’t need 25 minutes for the discussion, thought that is most probably because of the homogeneity of the group. I could see this activity working better in organisations where perhaps there is some disharmony among management, or in very mixed sector/industry groups.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 2 stars.
|
|
Looking at the differences/similarities between leadership and management, and exploring their relationship. A very pertinent exercise to run in present times because it also touches on the challenges of good leadership in times of change (eg economic), and the need for strong, transformational leadership being increasingly important. I desperately wanted to run this exercise with one all-female team, and one all-male team, as recommended in the trainer's notes, to explore gender differences in perceptions of leadership, but wasn't able to do this as I had only 3 females in a group of 14. However, I was still able to debrief the group about research which has been done highlighting these differences. A useful talking point but could be tricky for anyone who felt uncomfortable with this level of diversity training. The exercise fitted in well with a theme we have in our organisation of "Everyone is a Leader" and the handout on recognised differences between leaders and managers was useful given out after the exercise; the trainer can then pick out just a few of the points students made during the de-brief and link their comments to the research. I displayed the following quotation during this exercise: “Leadership is a 'people' activity, distinct from administrative paper shuffling or problem-solving activities” (Richard L. Daft and Dorothy Marcic) and then revisited this quote at the end of the debrief and with reference to their handout to ask them for their views on it. Again, could be done comfortably within 60 minutes, especially if you're doing it with a team of existing leaders (mine were first-line supervisors).
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Having the managers decide for themselves which cards (behaviors) belongs to managers and which belongs to leaders is great. Because they are involved and basically deciding it for themselves, the results have an impact. Two days later they were still referring to managements aspects which they thought were that of a leader and remembered it. We could easily incorporate this into the personality assessments as they now knew what is that they had to work on or embrace.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I used the Leadership Identikit activity as the opening exercise in a Team Leader Development Programme. It set the scene for the course perfectly because it enabled participants to focus on attitudes and behaviours needed to be an effective team leader really early on in the session. I ran it with five participants (one group of three and a pair) and it still provoked lots of lively discussion even though these are relatively small numbers. We could have gone on discussing the management/leadership attributes for at least another 30 minutes after the exercise concluded because it really did get people thinking – many were surprised just how different each other’s perceptions were. Thank you Trainers’ Library for another gem!
|
Previous Member
|
|
The trainers brief was clear and easy to follow, and the discussion questions helped to encourage delegates to share their thoughts. When the delegates were doing the actual exercise the cards provoked some interesting debates, which we were able to discuss when reviewing the exercise.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I recently used the Leadership Identikit module as part of a Leadership Skills course run in-house for a travel company. The identikit provides a number of statements referring to either leadership or management and delegates need to read out each statement and then together, decide which title it should go under. Regardless of where the delegates end up putting the statements, this exercise leads to a fantastic discussion in which a multitude of views are shared and mulled over. As the facilitator, it is important to keep the group on track and within the parameters of the exercise, otherwise there is the potential for the discussion to end up in all sorts of places! I found that occasionally I had to prompt, but that in the main there were enough delegates with differing points of view to have a good discussion around each statement and to ultimately decide where it belongs. The handout that shows the evidence on leadership studies helps to sort out the answers and provide everyone with some “real” analysis of the difference between the two. All in all, this exercise helps everyone to discuss the issues, understand the research and comprehend that in today’s societies there needs to be a mixture of both styles. In order to explain this, I talk about the Industrial Revolution, the history of piecemeal work, the move into towns and factories and the need for an overseer (manager) and the culture of today’s society and the need for something above and beyond. I would agree with the length of time this exercise takes but that’s also with my padding out.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To challenge participants to rank the qualities of a manager. • To allow participants to develop an understanding of the more important qualities that a manager can have, and what makes a great manager. • To discuss the differences in perception between what managers think and what their teams think.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing at least 80 minutes for this module. Aims: • To challenge participants to rank the qualities of a manager. • To allow participants to develop an understanding of the more important qualities that a manager can have, and what makes a great manager. • To discuss the differences in perception between what managers think and what their teams think. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants. Useful For: First time managers, work groups and teams of managers who wish to explore the expectations that teams have of their managers. You'll Need: Prior to the start of the course, print off and cut out the 54 ‘Quality Cards' and laminate them if possible to make them more hardwearing. You will require one set of 54 cards per team. You will also need to print off the Brief Cards. Half of the teams need Team Brief 1 and the rest will need Team Brief 2. Notes: This is a thought provoking module that is a powerful way of getting participants to think about the qualities they need to demonstrate as a manager.
Label
Reviews |
|
I ran this exercise with a group of managers who are going through a transformation with their team and the way they work. There are some of the group that are struggling to stop "doing the doing" and step into managing and leading to create a much more effective team. This module was incredible for probing into their beliefs and sparked some healthy debate across the team, an easy exercise to run but the team found it challenging (in a positive way) to come up with their final 5. They'll now be using the agreed list to hold each other to account and take forward as part of their "contract/culture" with each other and their teams. A great exercise to get teams challenging each other and explaining why they're so passionate about what they belief in, some quieter members certainly found their voices.
|
Helen McGowan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Good for an opening session in a management 101 course. Completed it a bit quicker than the guidelines suggested.
|
Rob Pyne
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To identify key learning points for running effective meetings. • To identify strategies for managing difficult behaviours in meetings.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify key learning points for running effective meetings. • To identify strategies for managing difficult behaviours in meetings.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Anyone being asked to chair a meeting, who might be concerned about how to manage difficult or challenging behaviours.
You'll Need: The audio recording of the story, which can be streamed from Trainers’ Library if you prefer not to read it aloud yourself.
Notes: This exercise is based around a silly, but fun story that makes a lot of important points about effective meetings. It might not be appropriate for all participant groups, but if you are looking for something fun, imaginative and involving, this could be the exercise for you! The exercise can be used to review learning, or to test participants' existing knowledge about how to run effective meetings. If reading the story to participants, we suggest that you rehearse reading the story aloud a few times prior to delivery.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This worked really well in a short (90 mins) session I ran on effective meetings alongside "A is for Apple".
I modified the exercise by doing the following:
1. Sent out pages 1-2 as pre-work, to get them thinking about the meeting and the characters involved. I also specified that the topic for the meeting would be around attracting more clients to the pet shop.
2. In two groups they brainstormed strategies for the different characters (4 each) and then shared their ideas across.
3. We then did a role play in groups of 6-8. One person was Owly, 4-5 were a selection of the pets, and 1-2 observed. Owlies were given a simple agenda. The others were given notes of how to play their character, and what idea to suggest. This was heaps of fun, attendees in fits of laughter, but did hightlight a number of important points.
I didn't give out the extra notes about the meeting itself, as these felt unnecessary. So generally, with a bit of twaeking and customisation it worked really well.
|
Jane Butler
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate how our own beliefs, values and past experiences affect how we perceive people and situations. • To raise awareness of how often unconscious bias impacts upon our perceptions of others. • To understand the impact of unconscious bias on our interactions with others and the decisions we take.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 10 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 40 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate how our own beliefs, values and past experiences affect how we perceive people and situations. • To raise awareness of how often unconscious bias impacts upon our perceptions of others. • To understand the impact of unconscious bias on our interactions with others and the decisions we take.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: If using this exercise with very large groups, place participants into pairs. Unconscious bias can apply to a range of topics and can be included in training on Recruitment, Equal Opportunities, Customer Service and Performance Management, etc.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this exercise recently as part of an online recruitment workshop, to highlight how unconscious bias affects how we do things. The delegates were really shocked when I showed them the images, particularly all but one delegate had chosen the same one, despite it being a really multi-cultural group.
The discussion that followed was brilliant, really getting everyone to think about why they had made the assumptions they had, and it fed really well into talking about selection for interview from c.v.s.
|
Louise Holloway
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To allow first time managers to become familiar with the important aspects of being a manager. • To help participants understand the three key roles of a manager.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing at least 60 minutes for this module. Aims: • To allow first time managers to become familiar with the important aspects of being a manager. • To help participants understand the three key roles of a manager. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants. Useful For: First time managers who are starting out in the role or managing a new team. This module is particularly useful for those individuals who need to understand some of the underlying principles of the role of manager. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: This module can be usefully followed by any First Time Manager or Leadership course module from Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I think this has wider usage than new to management - and is suitable for those who have done it badly for many years! It does create a lot of discussion, and argument, such that you may have to step in for dispute resolution. Give it a go...
|
Phil Hawthorn
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Great – quick and easy tool. Used this a lot and found that people take to it really well and can identify tasks really quickly and then find it fascinating to think about the ways they could use it, for example in planning meeting agendas to make sure that they are not over emphasising one side of the triangle. Didn’t take as long as the worksheet suggested. But worked really well as an introduction to the difference between leadership and management.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider different approaches to improving poor performance, and the relative merits of those different approaches. • To encourage participants to think about appropriate timescales over which they might expect to improve performance and standards. • To consider the implications of not taking action to improve poor performance.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 80 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 180 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To encourage participants to consider different approaches to improving poor performance, and the relative merits of those different approaches. • To encourage participants to think about appropriate timescales over which they might expect to improve performance and standards. • To consider the implications of not taking action to improve poor performance. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants. Useful For: Managers, or those who soon will be. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: There are two different versions of the team brief for this exercise. For junior managers we recommend using version 1, which contains a list of actions that the managers could consider when dealing with the issues of poor performance. For more experienced managers, we recommend using version 2, which does not provide any clues about the type of action they could take and encourages them to come up with their own solutions. This module is ideally suited for inclusion in training around managing change. You can reduce the amount of time needed for this module by approximately 30 minutes by not requesting a formal presentation and simply asking each team instead to talk through its proposed actions. Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Used this in a Leadership Development programme, following on from the Hungry Chick Inn Exercise. Modified it slightly so that rather than brainstorming performance solutions, we looked at performance conversations. Different members of the HR team took on the roles of the Chef, Receptionist and Head of Cleaning, and groups of 3 took turns in coaching each of them. Went down really well, and was great for practice and feedback.
|
Jane Butler
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I felt moved to write a review on this exercise after running it yet again, very successfully yesterday. A full day of training on performance management can be challenging for those who are new to line management or are lacking in confidence in dealing with under performance; however as a post-lunch exercise this gives everyone the chance to test out their views safely in small groups, as well as getting everyone back into the subject in a practical and engaging way. I have used the exercise both by giving out and by not giving out the possible solutions at the beginning. My experience is that even the most junior managers come up with a number of actions unprompted and so I would generally not give the the extra information. However I would recommend this if you are short of time, as the discussions are much shorter and the exercise could be completed in around 30 -40 minutes.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I ran this exercise as part of a performance management course. It's a good exercise to use after the lunch break as it gives the learners a practical situation outside their comfort zone (unless you work in hospitality) to be able to apply the theory and discussions from the morning session surrounding the performance management cycle. It's also a good way to identify any further issues that may need revisiting or require further clarity before the end of the day.
|
Nick Lennon-Barrett
|
|
This activity has been used as part of a Change Management course to clarify their learning. The activity makes them think about the problems at the Hungry Chick and what changes they would make. As there are employees involved it makes them think about how their decision would be made and how they would communicate any changes to their employee’s. I ran this with three different groups but they all came up with similar solutions to the issues.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the importance of credibility when seeking to influence others. • To understand the link between perceived expertise, relationships and credibility. • To provide an opportunity for participants to consider how much credibility they have with those they are seeking to influence.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To consider the importance of credibility when seeking to influence others. • To understand the link between perceived expertise, relationships and credibility. • To provide an opportunity for participants to consider how much credibility they have with those they are seeking to influence.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: If you want to go on and cover building relationships in more detail we recommend that you look at in some of the modules under ‘Negotiation’, for example Building Rapport and Different Perspectives.
Label
Reviews |
|
This was a very useful activity for less experienced presenters to think about how they can build their credibility. The matrix was particularly useful for less confident learners to consider that it's the audience perception of the presenter that counts (so you don't always have to be an expert on your presentation subject). Very useful.
|
Roxanne Moran
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Not a training module, but an additional handout that lists useful contacts, including addresses, websites and telephone numbers (including national helpline numbers).
About
Not a training module, but an additional handout that lists useful contacts, including addresses, websites and telephone numbers (including national helpline numbers). Please let us know at Trainers' Library is you know of any other contacts, which you believe should be added to this list.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To discover how to apply SMART when agreeing objectives for team members.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To discover how to apply SMART when agreeing objectives for team members.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility, or those who will have imminently.
You'll Need: • You may wish to have some spare copies of the Action Plan sheets included in the handout, in case participants have lots of ideas they wish to document.
Notes: This exercise follows on from Objectives – The SMART Way and is designed for managers who need to set objectives for team members. If you’re confident that participants already know SMART it can be run as a standalone exercise. However, we’d always recommend recapping on the five elements of SMART before beginning this module.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called SMART Objectives - Practice.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To explore differences within a group of people. • To encourage people to recognise and be comfortable with differences. • To begin conversations about the support we can provide others and the support we might like to request from others.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 50 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore differences within a group of people. • To encourage people to recognise and be comfortable with differences. • To begin conversations about the support we can provide others and the support we might like to request from others.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • To prepare the test flipchart (as shown on PowerPoint slide 2). • To pre-prepare 6-8 flipcharts with one of the questions from the Trainers’ Handout. • Plenty of sticky notes for participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand the importance of taking charge of one’s own learning and development. • To explore the emotional and psychological stages of learning new skills, knowledge and behaviours.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 60 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand the importance of taking charge of one’s own learning and development. • To explore the emotional and psychological stages of learning new skills, knowledge and behaviours.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants.
Useful For: Managers and those who have a responsibility for the development of staff. Also, those who wish to plan for and manage their own learning.
You'll Need: • Lengths of rope. Each of these needs to be about 30cms (12”) in length. You will need one length for each participant. • Plenty of coloured pens, sticky shapes (stars, coloured dots or similar) for participants to create their own Tips Sheets. • For the final exercise you will need to prepare your Tips Sheet in advance.
Notes: Before running this module you will need to know how to tie a figure of eight knot. Handout 1 is intended for the trainer’s use only and explains how to tie the knot.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 100 minutes.
Aims: • To explore different learning styles and preferences.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 75 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 100 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To explore different learning styles and preferences.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants.
Useful For: Managers and those who have a responsibility for the development of staff. Also, those who wish to plan for and manage their own learning.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This is module two in the series ‘Whose Development is It?’ Available from Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To define learning objectives and provide an opportunity for participants to practice writing learning objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 30 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To define learning objectives and provide an opportunity for participants to practice writing learning objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants.
Useful For: Managers and those who have a responsibility for the development of staff. Also, those who wish to plan for and manage their own learning.
You'll Need: • Flipchart paper and a selection of coloured pens.
Notes: This is module 3 in the series ‘Whose Development is it Anyway?’ available from Trainers’ Library. Each module stands alone but may also be combined with others in the series to form a longer session.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 20 minutes.
Aims: • To demonstrate the difference effective feedback can make to someone’s performance.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 10 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 20 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To demonstrate the difference effective feedback can make to someone’s performance.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants. Ideally, you'll have at least 4 participants though, so that you can demonstrate the 4 types of feedback described.
Useful For: Anyone who needs to give or receive feedback.
You'll Need: • Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This is a great way to demonstrate the difference it can make when feedback is given effectively. During the role-play element it is advisable to select with care the people who will be receiving the different types of feedback. It is also advisable to explain clearly at the start of the exercise that it will involve you role-playing different types of feedback.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this activity regularly where i want people to understand the importance of giving constructive feedback, it is a fun activity which helps break my session up as i am discussing a serious topic overall; it just allows delegates to understand it well from a different concept. It is definitely important to ensure you pick the right person to receive the negative feedback- i always explain to the person (not the whole group) that i need to use roleplay and are they ok with me being negative towards them- they don't know the concept of the exercise but i think its best to pre-warn the person.
|
Alison Lawrence
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have used this exercise a few times in training sessions on coaching and running 1-1 reviews. The role play element is quite fun to do but as the notes say you do need to pick your "victims" with care. Having examples of "feedback" to discuss makes it much easier and involving individuals from the group allows you to focus on how they felt about the feedback. On the whole, a fun exercise to open a session about giving feedback.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand the importance of delegating authority appropriately to other colleagues. • To introduce the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum as a method of deciding what levels of authority to delegate.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 55 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand the importance of delegating authority appropriately to other colleagues. • To introduce the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum as a method of deciding what levels of authority to delegate.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Those who have responsibility for other staff, or who will do very soon.
You'll Need: • One set of cards for every team of 2-3 participants. • Blu-tack.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A nice way to introduce a management styles model and consider the effectiveness of a particular case study.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|