|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about how and what they communicate to customers, using a slightly unusual perspective. • To encourage participants to think about the language they use when communicating with customers. • To show that all communication tells the customer something about the organisation, and that sometimes that’s not the intended message. • To demonstrate how brand is affected by every piece of communication leaving the organisation.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 25 minutes to complete (but can be shortened if necessary). In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To encourage participants to think about how and what they communicate to customers, using a slightly unusual perspective. • To encourage participants to think about the language they use when communicating with customers. • To show that all communication tells the customer something about the organisation, and that sometimes that’s not the intended message. • To demonstrate how brand is affected by every piece of communication leaving the organisation. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of almost any size (working in small teams of ideally fewer than 6 people). Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: • A set of ‘Sign of the Times’ cards with enough for at least two cards for each team. (If you’re working with a very large group you may need more than one set.)You might like to add your own signs to the exercise, perhaps including some from the organisation itself. • Plenty of sheets of flipchart paper. • Coloured marker pens. • Blu-tak.
Notes: This is a powerful exercise that really gets participants to think about the way organisations communicate. It is a useful addition to any customer service training but it is of particular use with groups that are responsible for brand and the way the organisation portrays itself to the outside world. This could be managers within the marketing department, branch managers, recruitment managers etc. It is suitable for all types of organisation, including public and charitable bodies. Please Note: The Sign of the Times Cards are a particularly large file (10mb) and may take a few minutes to download.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I recently used this exercise as part of an online workshop on recruitment for SME owners who were looking to take on new employees. I used it to highlight how the messages that companies put out to the public can influence what people think of them, and used that to move into talking about how their job ads reflected on the business. Linking marketing a product, or consumer branding to how they marketed a vacancy seemed to resonate very well, so will definitely use it again.
|
Louise Holloway
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I recently used A Sign of the Times activity for a newly formed recruitment team. I used it as a short interactive activity to get the team to see how confusing some messages can be, or how images don't always match with the words displayed.
It was great for generating discussion and debate and acted as an ice-breaker as well as it pulled everyone into the conversation.
I would use this again as I have now laminated the pictures so that I don't have to print off each time I run it.
We actually spent about 30 mins on this and the team had the cards displayed on the walls for the remainder of the week.
|
Pauline Weddell
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To identify specific actions that will enable groups to achieve a shared vision. • To help individuals see how they will contribute to the achievement of a shared vision.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To identify specific actions that will enable groups to achieve a shared vision. • To help individuals see how they will contribute to the achievement of a shared vision.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Staff at all levels working in a team. It is particularly well suited to new teams formed for a fixed period to manage/implement a project.
You'll Need: • Plenty of sheets of thin A4 card. • A selection of coloured pens (felt tip pens are ideal).
Notes: This module allows the group to share their ideas on how they intend to work together to achieve a shared vision. The group need to be clear about what their vision is. If this isn’t the case, then you might wish to use the module, Creating a Shared Vision beforehand to achieve this. If you are using the organisation, or team’s vision statement, you will need to pre-prepare a visual aid (PowerPoint or Flipchart) to display at the start of the exercise.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Great activity to enable teams to collaborate and work together in building a shared vision/strategy for the team.
|
Donna Rodgers
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
This is a good activity to run in conjunction with ‘creating a shared vision’ and is the logical next step. It was good for helping individuals identify the specific steps that are needed to create a shared vision. It was a good activity for placing some onus on each group member to realise how it is the individual parts that make up the whole. There is a little bit of preparation needed for this one, so make sure that you are able to access the additional resources outlined on the Trainers' Library website before you think about running this one.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about how they would introduce a change programme. • To consider the importance of establishing a sense that change is essential and urgent. • To encourage participants to think about how they'll sustain change.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about how they would introduce a change programme. • To consider the importance of establishing a sense that change is essential and urgent. • To encourage participants to think about how they'll sustain change.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: The primary aim of this exercise is to encourage participants to think about how they would introduce and communicate the need for change, and how they would manage the process of change, rather than to think, in detail, about what changes need to be made. However, if you prefer to give this exercise a broader perspective to include elements of strategic thinking and project management, you may wish to give participants longer in order to think about and plan in some detail, how they would change the mail-order operation in Beastly Barbecues, as well as how they’d then communicate and manage that change programme.
Label
Reviews |
|
I introduced this exercise into a senior leadership programme where the MD was concerned about the energy of his team in embracing and driving change. The exercise went well and the customer was pleased to report that in a subsequent management meeting there was a marked boldness in relation to making change happen that he had not seen before.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I used Beastly Barbeques within a module of a leadership programme where the focus was on delivering change. The module provided a great introduction to the topic of change management. Following the use of the case study, I took the participants through the Kotter model step-by-step and included supporting material such as SWOT and stakeholder analysis, preparing a vision statement and even a staff engagement presentation. Beastly Barbeques contained sufficient information to support discussions and apply all the supporting material to the scenario. The participants enjoyed the session and were able to apply the learning to their own workplace despite this being very different to the organisation described.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
You know the scene. Last minute call, desperate client – “I need a change management module for team leaders for next week. Can you help me out please?” You agree, look at your existing material and somehow it seems a bit flat and stale. So what do you do? You go to Trainers Library, browse and download “Beastly Barbecues”. That’s just what I did for a session with six public sector team leaders. Here are my thoughts: 1) Clear introductions and guidance. 2) Fun and meaty case study. 3) I ran it with just one team, adjusted timings accordingly and didn’t use the feedback sheet. No problems at all. 4) Group dived straight into it and therefore, some useful added learning points about taking some time to agree a process before going straight into analysis. Useful tip for problem-solving. 5) Although there was the tendency to plunge straight into detail, the case study engendered much useful discussion and the group pulled out key principles. 6) The case study kept them absorbed and interested throughout. 7) Learning points are telling and enabled me to integrate them into a simple model for explaining and developing change management approaches. 8) The group was enthusiastic about “the reality” of it, even though the context was very different from their own working context.
9) Evaluation at the end of the day was very positive and specifically highlighted the values of the case study. 10) A good time was had by all!
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand how a forecast profit and loss account is created. • To give participants the opportunity to practise drafting a simple profit and loss account. • To explain the importance of a projected cash flow statement. • To recognise that forecasts are only as good as the assumptions on which they are based.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 60 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To understand how a forecast profit and loss account is created. • To give participants the opportunity to practise drafting a simple profit and loss account. • To explain the importance of a projected cash flow statement. • To recognise that forecasts are only as good as the assumptions on which they are based.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff involved in business planning/financial forecasting for the first time.
You'll Need: • A calculator for every two participants.
Notes: This module is intended for people with no finance experience and looks at how to draw up simple finance projections for a business plan by drafting a forecast profit and loss account and a rudimentary cash flow statement. There is a current vogue not to include forecast balance sheets in business plans and so the balance sheet is not covered in this module.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short term objectives.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 35 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To show the value of breaking goals down into smaller chunks. • To provide participants the opportunity to practise breaking long-term goals down into a series of short-term objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: We have provided you with a suggested Gap Analysis about learning to juggle. If your participants all work in a similar role or for the same organisation, you might wish to substitute this example with one that is more relevant to your participants.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To consider the importance of momentum when innovating. • To look at what builds momentum behind a project or idea, and what saps energy from a project or idea.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 45 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To consider the importance of momentum when innovating. • To look at what builds momentum behind a project or idea, and what saps energy from a project or idea. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of any size. Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: For this exercise you'll need to be able to split your participants into 2 teams, each with a different room to work in. You'll also need to gather a set of 'building materials' for each team. Typically, we provide each team with the following: • 20 'pick-up' sticks. • 3 pairs of scissors. • 4 rulers. • 6 sheets of A3 card (or 12 sheets of A4 card). • A ball of string. • A roll of sticky tape. You can vary the materials you provide in any way you wish - the important thing is that each team must have exactly the same materials to work with (including the same number of pairs of scissors etc). You'll also need a toy car for each team (each should be the same size and weight). Choose a car that is 'Dinky' sized, rather than 'Matchbox' sized. (More mature UK readers will know what we mean!) For those of you who don't, we mean a car that is not too small - aim for something about six or seven inches long and weighing about 1lb (500 gram). We want this exercise to be challenging. Notes: For very large groups (20 or more participants) you’ll need more than 2 teams. Establish a number of small teams with 4 or 5 participants in them, and some very large teams with perhaps a dozen participants in them.
Label
Reviews |
|
This exercise works really well within the engineering sector. Engineers love having the chance to build something and even their colleagues in support functions are accustomed to working with colleagues to troubleshoot issues. Dividing the group into as many teams as possible, (even teams of 2 work well), creates a great sense of competition. Although it is a fun exercise, when working with senior teams, it does underline the challenges in maintaining momentum when introducing large or long term change.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise with a group of junior managers in our business to help focus on their team work skills and learn more about their leadership style. I love the interactivity of this activity as it focused on the behaviours of the individual. The feedback session was very good, the team were able to be very honest and constructive which proved to be very effective.
|
Jennifer Stevens
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this exercise with a group of 15 managers with the view to encouraging the group to think outside the box and also to bring some fun into how they interact with eachother. It proved to be very effective as it also challenges the teams to provide feedback on the appointed team leaders. We replaced the car with a golf ball. The fact that the bridge had to allow for a team member to pass underneath created a fun atmosphere but it was interesting to see the competitiveness between both teams
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore business planning as a process. • To identify the typical structure and contents of a business plan. • To identify the potential readership of a business plan. • To reflect on the contents of a business plan from a reader's perspective.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To explore business planning as a process. • To identify the typical structure and contents of a business plan. • To identify the potential readership of a business plan. • To reflect on the contents of a business plan from a reader's perspective.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff involved in business planning for the first time.
You'll Need: Copies of recent business plans.
Notes: This module is designed for staff coming to business planning with little prior knowledge, and employed within an established organisation. It will need tailoring for participants who wish to undertake business planning for a completely new venture. Finance issues are briefly covered but are covered in more detail in a separate module. Before running this module you will need to obtain copies of recent business plans. If you are an internal facilitator, you could use copies of your own organisation's business plans. Alternatively, you could search the internet for business plans of real organisations. Many organisations are happy for their plans to be used in training activities, but we do recommend that you obtain their permission first.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To agree what success looks like for everyone. • To establish effective working relationships within groups or teams. • To create a vision statement for the team.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 90 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 120 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To agree what success looks like for everyone. • To establish effective working relationships within groups or teams. • To create a vision statement for the team.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Staff at all levels working in a team. It is particularly well suited to new teams formed for a fixed period to manage/implement a project.
You'll Need: • Plenty of post-it notes and flipchart paper. • A selection of craft materials such as paints, brushes, glue, magazines, pieces of material. (You may prefer to restrict the materials available to coloured pens and paper, depending on the make up of the group you are working with.)
Notes: This module allows the group to share ideas about what is important to them and to agree some communal aim, values and aspirations. As a result of this exercise the whole team will participate in the creation of a shared vision. This activity can be used as a stand-alone activity or combined with others to form a longer event. The module Achieving a Shared Vision naturally leads on from this module.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I adapted this exercise slightly to use it with a group of people who had been TUPE transferred into the organisation. As they were a new team coming together from a range of different providers it was important that we brought them together quickly. The exercise was used in a 1/2 day strategy session. It created a lot of energy and helped the group not only come up with an agreed vision but it also highlighted how they had similar views / opinions despite coming from different backgrounds so worked with the team building element we were doing to (an unintended benefit). Fairly easy to do and very worhwhile
|
Mike Taylor
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
This activity can be a success, but I would suggest keeping in mind that not every participant would want to take part in such a creative exercise. I offered to run this for a client and they emailed me back saying that it wasn’t suited to their learning style and therefore wouldn’t be taking part! That said, as long as you're comfortable with the dynamic of the group you are working with then this is great activity for encouraging participants to think at a collective level about what success looks for them. Through moving from group to group it also provides an opportunity to begin to understand individual differences and priorities.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To define and briefly explore the concept of Customer Relationship Management. • To consider the types of data that helps organisations manage their customer relationships and where this can be found.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To define and briefly explore the concept of Customer Relationship Management. • To consider the types of data that helps organisations manage their customer relationships and where this can be found.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This is the first of a series of four modules that look at Customer Relationship Management (CRM) as a topic in its own right. In this first module, we look at what is meant by CRM and why it is important. The exercise looks at information required in order to start planning a customer relationship strategy.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this module when I was rolling out a new CRM across multiple sites. I often do a piece of ‘collaboration’ work at the start of a workshop to ensure that participant’s understanding and perspectives on a topic are as synchronised as possible before we move forward. What surprised me was that after I had broken the group into small teams, there was so much deliberation about what a CRM package actually was and what it was for etc. This was useful for gently highlighting to each group that there was something to be gained from the session and made gaining buy in that little bit easier.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To identify approaches and ideas that could be used in a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategy. • To develop a strategy based on the information provided about Dune Races. • To share ideas and thoughts about what makes an effective CRM strategy.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 45 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify approaches and ideas that could be used in a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) strategy. • To develop a strategy based on the information provided about Dune Races. • To share ideas and thoughts about what makes an effective CRM strategy.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A small prize for the winning team would be a nice touch.
Notes: This is the fourth in a series of four modules that look at Customer Relationship Management (CRM) as a topic in its own right.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 45 minutes.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 15 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 30-45 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand why we delegate. • To understand how to delegate effectively.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • A supply of Lego, with at least 15 large pieces for each team of 3-5 participants.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Building an Understanding of Delegation.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand what culture is and why it is important. • To encourage participants to actively consider and discuss the culture of their own organisation. • To elicit and compare the different perspectives that will exist about the organisation’s existing culture. • To consider the appropriateness of the organisation’s current culture to drive future business success (optional – for culture change workshops).
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60-90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand what culture is and why it is important. • To encourage participants to actively consider and discuss the culture of their own organisation. • To elicit and compare the different perspectives that will exist about the organisation’s existing culture. • To consider the appropriateness of the organisation’s current culture to drive future business success (optional – for culture change workshops).
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 15 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This activity is designed to provoke discussion around existing organisational culture, or to be used as an icebreaker for leadership programmes that contain a session on organisation or team culture. This activity is also suitable to be run as an internal facilitated session for organisations that are considering or are in the process of a culture change. This activity will encourage contribution and engagement from staff at all levels about current and future culture, and is equally suitable for senior managers and board directors. You will need to allow the longer time of 90 minutes if using the exercise as part of a culture change session.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 105 minutes.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 70 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 105 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To introduce managers to the subject of employee engagement. • To help managers begin to understand why employee engagement is central to being a successful manager.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of between 3 and 20 participants. Ideally, you'll have at least 6 participants though so that you can create 3 teams of 2 or more.
Useful For: Participants with managerial responsibility (or those who will have imminently.)
You'll Need: • Prepared flipcharts with simple 'cartoon' faces drawn on them - one face for each participant. • Post-it notes.
Notes: This exercise is designed for the start of an Employee Engagement workshop. Before the participants arrive – create a flip chart or charts with colourful cartoon faces on. Please have enough faces so that there is one for each participant. Have these on display at the start of the exercise. There are two parts to this exercise. It is essential that both are completed to ensure that learning is maximised.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
This was a good exercise for looking at the difference between satisfaction, motivation and employee engagement. I used this exercise after first sharing and looking at what employee engagement was about and with hindsight I wish I had done the exercise first. All three teams really wanted to engage with staff not just satisfy - it was a great exercise, with effort and participation high (the presentations were brilliant)and Employee Engagement was top priority on the learning outcome. But maybe the learning of the differences between the 3 areas was a little lost - note to self do the exercise first next time :).
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I found this module very useful and received some positive feedback from the delegates. The Marvelous Zoo exercise worked really well looking at the three different approaches, satisfying staff, motivating staff and engaging staff and how it all fits together.
|
Shirley Palmer
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
A great module, I have used it twice and each time the result has been positive. The exercise enables the delegates to quickly identify the difference between satisfied, motivated and engaged employees. Great to use with the other modules. Thank you Glasstap. Jayne Dark
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To provide an opportunity for participants to consider how they perceive themselves and how others perceive them.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 15 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To provide an opportunity for participants to consider how they perceive themselves and how others perceive them.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • One set of Feelings Cards per participant (provided).
Notes: Use this in any training session where you want participants to reflect on how they see themselves and how they think they are seen by others. You will need to use strong facilitation skills to debrief this exercise.
Label
Reviews |
|
The Feeling Cards exercise is a great tool for raising self-awareness. It involves the participant picking words that they feel represents them as a person and that they think others would choose to describe them. It says in the trainer’s notes that strong facilitation skills are required for this, this is a definite. The exercise worked well in that it made people think about perception, their own and that of others. I also found that it was a useful feedback tool as in all cases the participant got stuck in picking the right words and there was always someone willing to give their opinion. Again this had to be managed through strong facilitation but proved to be an invaluable benefit of the exercise. The exercise proved to have just the right balance of fun, opportunity for self-reflection and a forum for feedback.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I conducted a 3 day workshop where I included personality assessments on senior management level and combined this with training. First off I started with the "Feeling cards". I used this because the managers I was working with were known for the fact that they are incredibly efficient and effective, but at times too goal directed. This indicates that they often ignore or overlook the feelings/emotions of their colleagues and subordinates. I thought the feeling cards would provide them an opportunity to share their own feelings at home and at work. I believe this warmed them up a bit - and the most amazing is that it did "warm" them up to start the sessions. They really thought about the cards they
chose and the difference between home and work stood out in a strong way. I have to mention that their was a participant whose home and work behaviour was the same - I think it is important to note these differences. The fact that there are a lot of cards, makes them think, whereas if there were only a few cards to choose from, it would be much easier for them. They really took some time to identify their priorities and values.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider how customers and staff view their organisation. • To identify cultural/image strengths and weaknesses within the organisation. • To generate discussion about how cultural/image strengths can be maintained, and how weaknesses might be overcome.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 45 minutes to complete (but can be shortened if necessary). In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider how customers and staff view their organisation. • To identify cultural/image strengths and weaknesses within the organisation. • To generate discussion about how cultural/image strengths can be maintained, and how weaknesses might be overcome.
Group Size: Fairly adaptable but we would recommend use with groups of less than 15 participants, working in two teams.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: • One set of Feelings Cards per team. • Flipchart paper and marker pens for each team. • Blu-tack.
Notes: Use this as a catalyst for discussing how the organisation is currently viewed by its stakeholders, and how participants would like it to be viewed in the future.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library - Brand Reflection - How are we seen?.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the differences between a team and work group. • To help participants identify when a team or group is required.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be complete within 20 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete the module.
Aims: • To explore the differences between a team and work group. • To help participants identify when a team or group is required.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with most workshop/courses but is not recommended for use where the group has more than 25 participants (e.g., conferences).
Useful For: Teams, work groups and/or their leaders who wish to explore the current organisation and management of the group.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module can be usefully followed by the following modules: • Creating a Shared Vision. • Achieving a Shared Vision. It can also be a useful inclusion in any training intervention around remote teams.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 120 minutes.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the key steps in strategic planning. • To encourage participants to analyse financial and other data using a SWOT analysis. • To encourage participants to think about where they are now, before moving on in the next module to consider where they want to be.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 75 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 120 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants. It is strongly recommended that, for maximum impact and best overall use of time, this module is run in conjunction with the other modules from the Hotel Doldrums series.
Aims: • To build an understanding of the key steps in strategic planning. • To encourage participants to analyse financial and other data using a SWOT analysis. • To encourage participants to think about where they are now, before moving on in the next module to consider where they want to be.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will need a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. Hotel Doldrums can also be run as a teambuilding game, where teams are left to compete with less facilitator involvement during the exercise, but a thorough review at the end. This takes about 3.5 hours to run. If you prefer to use the teambuilding version of Hotel Doldrums, please download the trainer’s notes from the teambuilding games section of Trainers’ Library. This series of modules is set in the context of the hotel industry but requires no specialist knowledge of it. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this activity as part of a 2- day Business Skills module with a group of participants completing their Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award Scheme. I followed up with Part 2 and 3 and made a fabulous event. I added in a 'financial terms' quiz and some input on STEEPLE and SWOT before getting them to complete the activity.
It was really great to have the pack all produced and saved me so much time. The group completed the activities well and great learning about the importance of planning and not diving straight into the detail.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I used this with a team of Directors and Heads of Department as part of 2 Strategy days to encourage the team to think strategically as a team rather than functionally. I split the exercise over a day and a half and the timings worked well. I would recommend that if you are working with a group of people that you know well, that you chose the members of each team wisely. Although the financial information is not too complex, it is beneficial to have someone with an accountancy or commercial background in each team. If working with teams of consisting of just accountants, I would suspect that you could shorten the time taken. It has face credibility as a training exercise at senior levels.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
Strategy Workshop framed around Hotel Doldrums
I used this series with a group of middle/senior managers from a variety of SME's - it was an open programme - and it worked very well. We used it across about 5hrs in total and it worked well - they worked through breaks and lunch to ensure that we got everything done - and they still really enjoyed the process. We left out the banker evaluations (as per the previous review) and it still worked well. This decision was made purely because of time constraints.
The data is not too much for them to take in and start working with and, as the trainer, I could quickly see who was "getting it" and who might be struggling more.
The key learnings the group shared from the exercise were:
Dont rush into determining your strategy - take time to collate the right data
Ask others - involvement breeds buy-in
Be creative in your strategy development - sometimes it has to be something radical to change direction
Conversley to the above point - sometimes, slight adjustment will bring rewards!
Agreeing a vision is tough - and if you are not part of the process, its easy to see how the statement can become "meaningless words on a page"
Its amazing how quickly you can get into something - they seemed fully engaged on running a hotel by the end of it.
|
Rosemary Taylor
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To give participants the opportunity to identify and explore options and appraise these. • For participants to create a 3-5 year outline strategic plan based on the fictional case study they’ve been given.
About
This module follows on from Hotel Doldrums, part 1, and is not designed to be used as a stand-alone module.
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 135 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 180 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants.
Aims: • To give participants the opportunity to identify and explore options and appraise these. • For participants to create a 3-5 year outline strategic plan based on the fictional case study they’ve been given.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in conjunction with Part 1 and 3 as a two day Business Skills session for participants completing their Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award. A great team activity to encourage some strategic thinking and planning. The structure of the session makes it easy to follow and I added in some of the creative thinking tools and decision making tools from other Glasstap activities so everything came together really well. Having the materials all prepared is so easy and saved me so much time in my course preparation.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 240 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to develop a strategy from the options generated in previous sessions. • To encourage participants to prepare and give a persuasive presentation outlining their strategy and the work they have done. • To reflect on the learning from the Hotel Doldrums series of modules.
About
This module follows on from Hotel Doldrums, parts 1 and 2, and is not designed to be used as a stand-alone module.
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 140 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 240 minutes for this module if working with 10-12 participants.
Aims: • To encourage participants to develop a strategy from the options generated in previous sessions. • To encourage participants to prepare and give a persuasive presentation outlining their strategy and the work they have done. • To reflect on the learning from the Hotel Doldrums series of modules.
Group Size: An ideal group size for this module is 12, with participants working in 3 teams of 4. If you have more than 15 participants in your group, you may want to consider ‘doubling up’ on some of the briefs with more than one team using the same scenario. This doesn’t detract from the learning; in fact it can be interesting to see how different teams approach the same problem and task.
Useful For: Staff at all levels including individuals, groups and teams that need to use strategic planning and analysis skills in the workplace.
You'll Need: Each team will a hotel data pack (provided) and a syndicate room or area.
Notes: Hotel Doldrums is a series of modules that are designed to be run in sequence. Together they form a complete 1.5 day workshop, which can be run as a single workshop, or as three independent sessions, each lasting between 2 and 4 hours. We’ve also suggested other modules you could add to the programme, if you have more time available. The modules, when used together, also draw out skills relating to business planning, problem solving, influencing, team working and making presentations.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this activities as part of a 2 day Business Skills Programme for participants on a Duke of Edinburgh Gold Award Scheme. Having completed part 1 and 2, this was a great way to end the session. Some great learning and an opportunity for them also to present and identify further development needs.
I kept it quite high level throughout so we didn't get too bogged down in the financials, focussing more on how they developed their ideas and presented them in a way that was helpful for their learning, so our bank managers adopted a more holistic approach and giving feedback based on some sound business ideas but also passion and energy!
A great activity and the materials saved me hours if not days in preparation time. The debrief questions were also helpful throughout to ensure we got lots of learning and practical application to take back to work.
|
Ann Pemberton
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I facilitated this, along with Parts 1 and 2 at a recent leadership workshop for business owners. It was fantastic and they all really loved it. I ran all three parts in one day, so condensed it quite a bit (we had previously spent time on analysing a business and how to develop a strategy, so it was mostly a 'putting it all together' day). Due to their personalities and entrepreneurial nature, they wanted to jump straight to part 3, which provided a valuable lesson in itself! They all found it so useful and easy to relate it to their own businesses too.
|
Jennifer Lindsay-Finan
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
This project management series was of unbelievable value, as it really got them working and participating. I believe that most participants are under the impression that they will attend a workshop/training and that they will only be listening. The SWOT analysis has so much detail that it is
almost impossible to miss details of your strategic planning process. The managers all recognized that the three difference hotels were different is specific ways, but the ideas that came out of it were
amazing. With the last hotel doldrum the participant needs to do a presentation - and among all the other learning points, one participant noticed that he need to work on his "presentation skills" and how to carry a message over to important people. Another great attribute is the financial details that are attached to the downloads. This provides the participant with a feeling of credibility and believability of the exercise they are busy with.
|
Previous Member
|
|
I have now run Hotel Doldrums twice as a 1 day team build exercise. Marketing Team
This team is quite large (24 in total) and is spread throughout the country. Their opportunity to spend time together as a team is limited. Also, the team manager knew some elements of the team very well and others hardly at all having ‘inherited’ them following a company take over. A big part of this team build day was to get to know each other on a personal as well as a business basis. I ran the exercise after going through some personality profiling. It was really powerful to see how people responded in their preferred behavioural style and perhaps even more so how their fellow team members recognised the behaviours!! Not surprisingly there was an abundance of creativity going around, when the analytical people tried to intervene there were some ‘clashes’ although always controlled, usually ending up in peels of laughter. It did, however, demonstrate the need to listen to all team members and give everyone the chance to contribute. A good learning for the stronger personalities in the group. Time management was an issue and gave the team manager an insight as to why and how deadlines sometimes slip. She left the session with a strategy for managing this within the team more effectively in the future.>p The meetings with the Bank Manager weren’t particularly successful. I’m not sure whether this was the way I positioned this aspect of the training or not. The overall feedback was that the meetings contributed very little and took away valuable time. A number of leaders emerged. Some based on personalities and others on expertise again demonstrating the advantages of having a good mix within the team. The need for a 3 month plan did give focus to think about the future. The team are often required to be reactive, rapid change being a trait in our industry. Having to plan in a structured way for the future was a useful learning and demonstrated how much control you get when you are able to do this. The final presentations were very light on financial information which was recognised as something of a problem given that they were for the bank manager!! Known your audience eh? There was much emphasis on how they would ‘pretty-up’ the respective hotels, what fun things they could offer and how they would improve the experience to encourage the return of guests. Not so much thought around what would happen if people didn’t return!! Glass half full perhaps? The most valuable things taken from the exercise were: Recognising and be able to utilise the strengths within the team. The importance of planning Thinking inside the box as well as outside it! Raising awareness of financial implications around the roles of the team members. Working as a team. Strategic Sales Team I ran the exercise again 4 weeks later with a smaller team of strategic sales people. This team have huge transformation in front of them due to changes in our business so it was good to give them a subject they were totally unfamiliar with. The team had slightly less time which proved a challenge and a learning point for me here is that a smaller team doesn’t necessarily mean less time. There was definitely a more financial focused approach and less creativity. As with the previous group the presentations ran over time neither groups having practised. They would argue they didn’t have time….I would argue they should have made time!!! Creativity was limited in this session and it highlighted the need to involve other areas and expertise within the business for the new challenges ahead. This team had a brand new manager who was eager to demonstrate his style. He joined in the exercise which proved really valuable and his team could see he would not ask them to do anything he wouldn’t or couldn’t do himself. We did not include the bank manager role this time and in all honesty I don’t think the exercise lost anything as a result. Again the need for a 3 month plan was very powerful and I would say that this was the most valuable aspect for both sessions. All in all, this is an excellent exercise with an incredible amount of learning from it. It has been a huge success and I will/would use it again and again.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 35 minutes.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider the value and difficulty caused by organisational politics and political games. • To create an understanding that managers cannot avoid politics and so need to know the games in which they may – deliberately or inadvertently – be playing.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 25 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 35 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To enable participants to consider the value and difficulty caused by organisational politics and political games. • To create an understanding that managers cannot avoid politics, so need to know the games in which they may – deliberately or inadvertently – be playing.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with larger groups of up to almost any size. It tends not to work well with very small groups.
Useful For: All managers, but particularly those who are new to management and may not understand the political nature of organisations, including their own.
You'll Need: • Post-it notes, flipchart paper, scribble paper, pens and marker pens for each team.
Notes: This module works best if you set up the room ‘cabaret style’ – that is with table teams of between 4 and 8 people per table. This is the first in a series of three modules examining power and politics. It can be used on its own as a short session or with the other two to form a complete half day programme. Politics is often seen as a ‘dirty word’ by many people, or as one in which they have no interest. The purpose of this module is for the participants to recognise that divorcing themselves from politics is a decision that could affect them adversely – and is, in itself, a political act. To influence the direction an organisation is taking means people taking part in politics.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To allow participants the opportunity to identify their own sources of power, to know which they need to develop and to have an action plan for doing this.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 50 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 80 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To allow participants the opportunity to identify their own sources of power, to know which they need to develop and to have an action plan for doing this.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants.
Useful For: All managers but especially those who are new to the management role and may feel that they have little power of their own to allow them to accomplish results.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module is the third in a series looking at influence, power and politics. Whilst this module can be run on its on, it will have more effect if used as a follow on to the work done in Influence 2 - Sources of Power. If you are running this module on its own and not as a follow-on, you will find it helpful to have looked at the five power sources identified in the Influence 2 - Sources of Power module before you begin.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • Identify key stakeholders when delivering a workplace project. • Ensure that key stakeholders have a positive influence on the outcome of a project.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 55 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module.
Aims: • Identify key stakeholders when delivering a workplace project. • Ensure that key stakeholders have a positive influence on the outcome of a project.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Staff at all levels working to deliver workplace projects.
You'll Need: • Flipchart paper, pens and post it notes.
Notes: This exercise involves creating an Action Plan for influencing stakeholders on a real project. We recommend that you encourage your participants to identify the project they will use before they come to the training session.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 75 minutes for this module. Aims:• Understand the difference between leadership and management and the importance of both. • To identify ways that participants can lead and manage their most important team members. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 25 participants. Useful For: Participants with current (or imminent) managerial responsibility. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This exercise is a great way to open up a workshop about leadership. It removes the need for the more traditional participant introductions and enables you to observe the participants in action and explore their priorities and attitudes to managing people. You can run this exercise with a range of team sizes, with between 4 and 8 players in each team. Please select the correct Clue Card pack based on the number in the team. Choose the team sizes that work for you. For example, with a group of 15, the exercise can be run with 3 teams of 5 or 2 teams, one of 7 and the other 8.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in a Leadership workshop and it was helpful to get people to think about what a leader needs to do when taking action with the team and its development. All of the teams came up with different priorities which sparked off considerable discussion about what areas to prioritize especially if you are a new manager. You really need to help at the start with communication as some groups were not sure what to do and you may need to lead them to sharing their clues. It was a good exercise in communication and collaboration. Make sure you have enough time for any groups that may not complete the grid as quick.
As part of the preparation we did adapt the tool by including some of the titles in the box e.g. the 12 month goals and feedback and I am glad we did as quite a few participants had never used this style grid before and they still ended up getting bogged down in completing the grid - even with this additional help. It is important that they get time to discuss their first actions rather than just completing the grid.
The exercise highlights the importance of focusing on the positives within a team rather than spending time on the negatives.
|
Stephanie Fry
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
I ran this exercise as an icebreaker for the launch workshop of a new Management Development Program. It worked well to get the participants working together, although there was a period of time at the start where no one seemed to know what they had to do, which was slightly uncomfortable as the participants didn't all know each other. I dealt with this by saying "someone in the team knows what to do".
The different approaches taken by the two team was interesting. One team tackled it exactly as I would - filling out all the categories and then cross-referencing the information to complete the grid. The other team were focused on going through each name and trying to complete the whole information one person at a time. I was sure this wouldn't work, but somehow it did! I think they must have made the connections by reading out the info several times. It was useful to bring out a learning point about letting people tackle problems in their own way, and that my way is not always the only way! I did drop in some helpful comments, e.g. steering them away from guessing at answers and telling them that all the facts they needed were provided.
On the less positive side, the "feedback" items and goals are not super clear and took a bit of working out.
A good exercise to lead into a discussion of managing vs leading though and I will definitely be using it again.
One other small point - if the size of the cards could be made the same on all the sheets that would make me happy!
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
We used this module to set the tone for a leadership programme targeted at new leaders.
The group did not know one another so it served well as an ice-breaker. But more importantly it set the tone for our discussion around the differences between leading and managing. Previously we started this programme without this exercise and there was a lot of confusion around the differing roles of managers and leaders.
The materials are set out really well, though I would recommend plenty of spares as participants tended to request additional grids as they made errors.
Also, I think be clear about what you are trying to achieve. If your priority is completion of the activity then the time limit is great. If you would like more focus around the actual debate of “who your priorities are” then I would suggest the facilitator assists more and more so that they have around 10-15mins for discussion at completion of the grid, however each group is different.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To identify improvements that can be made. • To identify things that need to be taken into consideration when planning continuous improvement activities. • To plan one improvement that can be implemented in the workplace.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 35 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify improvements that can be made. • To identify things that need to be taken into consideration when planning continuous improvement activities. • To plan one improvement that can be implemented in the workplace.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called Planning an Improvement.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 100 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 180 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To define aims, goals and objectives. • To identify the purpose of goal setting. • To introduce a six-step model for goal setting. • To enable participants to practise goal setting. • To identify and discuss some tools and techniques that support setting and achieving goals. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: Although the whole module may take 3 or more hours to run, this is comprised of several smaller sessions that can, if necessary and appropriate, be separated. This module is appropriate for anyone who needs to set and achieve goals in the workplace, their career or their personal life. You may find it helpful to work through the definitions set out in the first session and apply them to a goal of your own, so that you have a personal example to share with participants if they are a little reluctant to discuss their own goals. Session four is a long session (2 hours) that takes participants through the goal setting process and allows time for them to define and describe in detail their goal(s). It is split into several sub-sections (linked to the stages of goal setting) for ease of use. The timing of a break is suggested but it may be taken at any time during this session, as convenient for the group.
Label
Reviews |
|
This a simple goals setting activity which works however I found bits of it a bit long winded. Great for SMART goal seeting for managers new to managing. It is very thorough and sets out a good process for SMART goals.
|
Anjana Rajani
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
In defining goal setting I added in an essence exercise to get people to generate their own definitions, and a more practical demonstration of why goals are important (as otherwise I found it a bit too passive/sedentary). However, I really liked the way the module describes aim, goal and objective and the section on accentuating the positive (though I adapted the slide examples to suit my personal style). The final section on actually implementing goal setting was good. Some delegates found it really difficult, but the framework provided by this module helped most learners grasp the stages. All in all a good all encompassing look at why and how to set effective goals.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 50 minutes.
Aims: • To provide a basic understanding of continuous improvement as a process and management tool. • To place continuous improvement in context through a participatory exercise.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To provide a basic understanding of continuous improvement as a process and management tool. • To place continuous improvement in context through a participatory exercise. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: • Old newspapers and sticky tape - see notes. Notes: You will need a large pile of old newspapers and some reels of sticky tape for this exercise. You will also need to have made one "standard design" camel from folding or scrunching newspaper and using sticky tape. This camel should have discernible legs, a head and a hump; but does not have to be a work of art! The participants need to be able to roughly copy it (note - the exercise is about improving upon the original). Finally you need to make a baton from newspaper, which will be used to bat the camel along in the camel races. You will also require space to set up a track - this can usually be achieved by safely moving tables and chairs to the sides of the room. You may wish to have a supply of small prizes available for the camel race winners.
Label
Reviews |
|
I have used this activity a couple of times to embed change management/continuous improvement and management principles. it has always been well received and staff have thoroughly enjoyed it. it allows staff to learn principles whilst having fun.
|
Donna Rodgers
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I have use this activity a couple of times. Once I used with 40 people. We had 8 camels racing in 2 heats and then a grand final. As well as being fun and creative it made the point of continuous improvement. Also I adapted it to use on a team building event at a racecourse. One hump or two became one carrot or two. I had delegates race their horses passed the finish post at Plumpton Race Course.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To welcome participants to the course. • To introduce the facilitator and participants to each other. • To discover the participants needs. • To encourage interaction and discussion. • To practise writing SMART objectives.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 40 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 50-60 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To welcome participants to the course. • To introduce the facilitator and participants to each other. • To discover the participants needs. • To encourage interaction and discussion. • To practise writing SMART objectives.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Supervisors and above.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Notes: This module provides a long introduction to courses, but is particularly useful where the concept of SMART objectives is important to the training being delivered. It provides an ideal introduction to performance management training for example.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this in a recent time management session and found it was the one area of the session that didn't excite. Most understood it therefore felt I was going over old ground. Not one of the more inspiring or creative sessions.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
I used this session with a mixed experienced group of managers all from the same company. Surprisingly at the beginning of the session 8 out of 10 said they were familiar with setting SMART goals however at the end they all commented that they didn't really appreciated the value and had not been setting SMART goals or objectives. The exercise really got them thinking and although they found it challenging it made the points quickly.
|
Jayne Dark
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
We had an issue in that staff had been asked to ‘coach’ using SMART rather than a specific coaching model such as e.g. GROW. In practice they did neither, as they were not familiar with what SMART actually meant (broken down) and then HOW to make SMART work for them. I wanted to emphasise and familiarise people with what SMART actually is and how to use it appropriately. The module clearly outlines in some detail what the ‘specifics’ of SMART are, more importantly it offers a very clear exercise with numerous examples to reinforce the process. This was actually sufficient but I used the fact that was promoted ‘Specific works better in a financial situation’ to ensure two things happened – firstly that they could ensure that their ‘specific’ objective was in fact a realistic, tangible and measurable outcome. This made a huge difference to their choice of ‘specific’. The second result from this realisation which you can then reinforce is, that they actually then use SMART in support of a realistic business coaching outcome. Satisfying both the learning outcomes with which I was challenged at the very outset.
|
Previous Member
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 80 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the nature of risk. • To encourage participants to think about risk in relation to project management. • To provide participants with an understanding of basic risk management strategies.
About
Time: The exercises in this module will take about 30 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 80 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the nature of risk. • To encourage participants to think about risk in relation to project management. • To provide participants with an understanding of basic risk management strategies. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Team leaders and junior management. You'll Need: • A large supply of sticky labels that participants can write on. (Ideally these should be in a variety of colours). • Plenty of coloured pens. • A prize for the ‘best’ Snakes and Ladders board would be a nice touch. Notes: This module can be used as a follow on from The Wedding Planner, and The Runaway Bride to create a half-day training programme.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 70 minutes.
Aims: • To generate ideas for improving customer service, a process, department, business…any aspect of a business or organisation. • To encourage participants to think from different angles.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 70 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To generate ideas for improving customer service, a process, department, business…any aspect of a business or organisation. • To encourage participants to think from different angles.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of almost any size.
Useful For: Anyone who wants to generate ideas for continuous improvement.
You'll Need: • A set of ‘Brainstorm Bench’ cards.
Notes: Although the brainstorm/discussion activity and discussion can be completed in 40 minutes, we strongly recommend adding the action planning activity outlined at the end of the module, which adds a further 30 minutes, unless this is incorporated elsewhere in your training. We’ve included some wacky questions in the set of Brainstorm Bench cards. These are in blue to make them easier to identify, so you can decide if you’d like to include them.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this exercise at the end of a days workshop on Performance Management and the organisation, with a group of international delegates who were looking to modernise their performance management systems. I found it worked really well, particularly at the end of a fairly intense day, as it got them thinking more broadly about what they could put into action when they got back to work, rather than getting stuck on the first ideas that had come to mind. It also helped to see where the synergies between different departments were, which promoted a more cross team approach. Will definitely use again.
|
Louise Holloway
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the extent to which staff feel engaged with the organisation they work for. • To consider who staff feel is responsible for business performance. • To think about how vision and values are used within the organisation. • To demonstrate how values can be ingrained in the organisation. • To consider the benefits of an organisation where staff feel engaged and responsible for the business outcomes.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 60 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 90 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To encourage participants to think about the extent to which staff feel engaged with the organisation they work for. • To consider who staff feel is responsible for business performance. • To think about how vision and values are used within the organisation. • To demonstrate how values can be ingrained in the organisation. • To consider the benefits of an organisation where staff feel engaged and responsible for the business outcomes.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Managers.
You'll Need: For this exercise you will need a good quantity of greeting card making materials. For example: Glue, Double sided tape or pads, Scissors, Card of various colours and textures, ribbon of various colours and gold/silver markers. You'll need enough materials for each team of 4-6 participants to make one 'template' card and one 'team' card of their own design.
Notes: This exercise was first used at the 2008 Trainers' Library Conference and has been designed around the five 'passions' that underpin our business. It's an unusually personal module that we've used to share some of the key principles and approaches that we believe have been key to the success of Glasstap. It's been added to Trainers' Library in response to requests from participants who attended the conference. You can use the five values we’ve suggested for the exercise to great effect, but the exercise can be easily adapted to your own organisation’s vision and values. However, we strongly recommend limiting the number of values used in this exercise to 6 or fewer. If your organisation doesn’t have a clear set of values or principles, you could use an exercise like ‘Feelings Cards’ to generate discussion around people’s values and to identify some possible organisational values for the future.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library called The E-Card Factory - Balancing Business with Values.
Label
Reviews |
|
I used this as part of an induction program when participants were joining an organisation with a real passion for their values.
It was a good way to introduce the concept of values and why they matter. It enabled us to have an honest and open debate about what people really thought about values and was a creative way to tackle some quite interesting viewpoints in an open and constructive way.
Although the trainer notes say it is aimed at managers, I would say more junior members of staff would get value from it too (& possibly more so)
|
Frances Ferguson
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 40 minutes.
Aims: • To identify the benefits and dangers of internal customer care programmes. • To reach agreement on how to define internal customer care as a desirable goal.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 20 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 40 minutes to complete this module.
Aims: • To identify the benefits and dangers of internal customer care programmes. • To reach agreement on how to define internal customer care as a desirable goal.
Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Staff at all levels.
You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To describe the change curve. • To consider strategies for working through the change curve journey.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 40 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 60 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To describe the change curve. • To consider strategies for working through the change curve journey.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: All staff, including managers.
You'll Need: • Article – ‘When Change Really Hurts’, available in the Articles section of Trainers’ Library. • The Change Curve Cards (downloaded from Trainers’ Library). • Post-it notes and pens.
Notes: This can be a challenging session to run so it’s important that you feel confident in your knowledge and have lots of information to add if the group clams up. Apart from the article that you need for the session, you may also find it useful to read those by Damian Hughes and Martin Haworth, also available in the Articles section of Trainers’ Library.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A review has not been posted for this item. If you are a member of Glasstap you can submit one using the contact us screen. |
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 75 minutes.
Aims: • To explore the concept of an internal service chain. • To give participants the opportunity to map an internal service chain and identify critical internal relationships.
About
Time: The exercise in this module will take about 55 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 75 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To explore the concept of an internal service chain. • To give participants the opportunity to map an internal service chain and identify critical internal relationships. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 25 participants. Useful For: Staff at all levels. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided.
Label
Reviews |
|
As this was a Team Dynamics event I then built on this with the Internal Service Chain as an example of firstly, how to make it work for their direct reports and then, how to extend it to their peers and colleagues as a useful building block. The key was the simplicity of the model. How to assess and understand what each person in the chain is responsible for, and then responsible to. Secondly, the impact of non-delivery by any one part on the wider team either side of them. I built this around feedback (here’s what has happened) and feedforward (here’s what I would like to see) to build and develop the relationships. I had previously used the ‘making a cup of tea’ to get them to appreciate how important it is to clearly define process but the GLASSTAP’s KITCHEN’s examples work equally well, just with more opportunities to work with and in a very different context (we are a call centre) but the principles and learning remain the same. This made it fun to participate in and it actually obliged them to think more closely around how they manage and influence those relationships either side of the chain to make it both efficient and effective an outcome.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 60 minutes.
Aims: • To allow first time managers to become familiar with the important aspects of being a manager. • To help participants understand the three key roles of a manager.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 45 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing at least 60 minutes for this module. Aims: • To allow first time managers to become familiar with the important aspects of being a manager. • To help participants understand the three key roles of a manager. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to about 20 participants. Useful For: First time managers who are starting out in the role or managing a new team. This module is particularly useful for those individuals who need to understand some of the underlying principles of the role of manager. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: This module can be usefully followed by any First Time Manager or Leadership course module from Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
I think this has wider usage than new to management - and is suitable for those who have done it badly for many years! It does create a lot of discussion, and argument, such that you may have to step in for dispute resolution. Give it a go...
|
Phil Hawthorn
rated this item with 4 stars.
|
|
Great – quick and easy tool. Used this a lot and found that people take to it really well and can identify tasks really quickly and then find it fascinating to think about the ways they could use it, for example in planning meeting agendas to make sure that they are not over emphasising one side of the triangle. Didn’t take as long as the worksheet suggested. But worked really well as an introduction to the difference between leadership and management.
|
Nicky McCrudden
rated this item with 3 stars.
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 180 minutes.
Aims: • To encourage participants to consider different approaches to improving poor performance, and the relative merits of those different approaches. • To encourage participants to think about appropriate timescales over which they might expect to improve performance and standards. • To consider the implications of not taking action to improve poor performance.
About
Time: This exercise will take about 80 minutes to complete. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing 180 minutes to complete this module. Aims: • To encourage participants to consider different approaches to improving poor performance, and the relative merits of those different approaches. • To encourage participants to think about appropriate timescales over which they might expect to improve performance and standards. • To consider the implications of not taking action to improve poor performance. Group Size: This module is suitable for use with groups of up to 15 participants. Useful For: Managers, or those who soon will be. You'll Need: Nothing other than the materials provided. Notes: There are two different versions of the team brief for this exercise. For junior managers we recommend using version 1, which contains a list of actions that the managers could consider when dealing with the issues of poor performance. For more experienced managers, we recommend using version 2, which does not provide any clues about the type of action they could take and encourages them to come up with their own solutions. This module is ideally suited for inclusion in training around managing change. You can reduce the amount of time needed for this module by approximately 30 minutes by not requesting a formal presentation and simply asking each team instead to talk through its proposed actions. Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
Used this in a Leadership Development programme, following on from the Hungry Chick Inn Exercise. Modified it slightly so that rather than brainstorming performance solutions, we looked at performance conversations. Different members of the HR team took on the roles of the Chef, Receptionist and Head of Cleaning, and groups of 3 took turns in coaching each of them. Went down really well, and was great for practice and feedback.
|
Jane Butler
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I felt moved to write a review on this exercise after running it yet again, very successfully yesterday. A full day of training on performance management can be challenging for those who are new to line management or are lacking in confidence in dealing with under performance; however as a post-lunch exercise this gives everyone the chance to test out their views safely in small groups, as well as getting everyone back into the subject in a practical and engaging way. I have used the exercise both by giving out and by not giving out the possible solutions at the beginning. My experience is that even the most junior managers come up with a number of actions unprompted and so I would generally not give the the extra information. However I would recommend this if you are short of time, as the discussions are much shorter and the exercise could be completed in around 30 -40 minutes.
|
Paula Cook
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
I ran this exercise as part of a performance management course. It's a good exercise to use after the lunch break as it gives the learners a practical situation outside their comfort zone (unless you work in hospitality) to be able to apply the theory and discussions from the morning session surrounding the performance management cycle. It's also a good way to identify any further issues that may need revisiting or require further clarity before the end of the day.
|
Nick Lennon-Barrett
|
|
This activity has been used as part of a Change Management course to clarify their learning. The activity makes them think about the problems at the Hungry Chick and what changes they would make. As there are employees involved it makes them think about how their decision would be made and how they would communicate any changes to their employee’s. I ran this with three different groups but they all came up with similar solutions to the issues.
|
Previous Member
|
|
|
|
Time:
In total we estimate this exercise will take 90 minutes.
Aims: • To understand the importance of delegating authority appropriately to other colleagues. • To introduce the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum as a method of deciding what levels of authority to delegate.
About
Time: The exercise in this module can be completed in about 55 minutes. In total, allowing for discussion, we recommend allowing about 90 minutes for this module.
Aims: • To understand the importance of delegating authority appropriately to other colleagues. • To introduce the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Continuum as a method of deciding what levels of authority to delegate.
Group Size: This module can be used with groups of up to 25 participants.
Useful For: Those who have responsibility for other staff, or who will do very soon.
You'll Need: • One set of cards for every team of 2-3 participants. • Blu-tack.
Remote/Virtual Delivery: There is a Remote Delivery version of this module available in Trainers’ Library.
Label
Reviews |
|
A nice way to introduce a management styles model and consider the effectiveness of a particular case study.
|
Lisa Lester
rated this item with 5 stars.
|
|
|
|